Ibrew2or3 (8159) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - JUN 29, 2006
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Golden color with small white head. Nice lager aroma of malts and a bit of skunk. The flavor was refreshing and smooth. Malty notes to go along with some noble hops. It leaves a pleasant malt aftertaste that isnít too sweet. Other than the small skunk smell I couldnít detect a fault in this beer.
Storm (2684) - Amager, DENMARK - JUN 28, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
33 cl bottle 4.5%. No yeast at the bottom. Light golden clear colour with a weak head. Aroma of rice, grain, malt and some hops. Flavour of rice, malt and hops very light but drinkable for a lager.
hopdog (11560) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 27, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Poured a lighter golden/yellow color with a small sized white head. Aromas of corn, grain and malts. Tastes of corn with a light honey sweetness. Thin and watery body.
KingofCastle (208) - London, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 27, 2006
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2006 355 mL bottle: Why are people being so hard on this pale lager? OK, it is not so much "premium" as "light." It is sweet and goes down smoothly, some good qualities in a lager. Not much hops or bitterness, easy-drinking for sure. To complain this lacks body is to miss the point of what this lager is trying to be, so just take it for what it is. Watery, sort of, but refreshing. Compared to choking back some of our macro import canned lagers, this is very smooth.
BobbyW3363 (154) - Portland, Oregon, USA - JUN 26, 2006
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Golden-colored, small white head. Sweet grainy aroma. Taste is also somewhat sweet; not bad but lacking any complexity. Pretty boring, but drinkable. Singha is better.
scanman (150) - Santa Cruz, California, USA - JUN 24, 2006
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pleasant but nothing special. Iíve had this lager a dozen or so times and never seems to impress me. Malty and lacks zing, not really refreshing
cazort (559) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 23, 2006
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer is a lot better than the average American macro-brew; itís lacking compared with the average euro-import, or good American brews like Yuengling. Sweet but not offensively so, some hops and some bitterness. Overall my complaint is of the body--it is thin as water. If they made this one a little bit richer and fuller, it would be a decent beer.
LadyCooper (100) - Halifax, Nova Scotia, CANADA - JUN 16, 2006
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pale yellow with a head that fizzed out quickly. Malty and a bit watery, but crisp and cool.
jrohn92 (105) - USA - JUN 16, 2006
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. I was impressed for a pale lager. Tsing Tao has a smoothe taste still it is not a high end beer.
jason (1834) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 14, 2006
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
For the price of this beer I donít think itís worth it. No defining aroma. Decent appearance with a decent head. Flavor isínt bad but not great. The good thing about this beer is that it goes well with chinese food.