mike mcneil (660) - St Augustine, Florida, USA - APR 24, 2005
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Standard Chinese restaurant brew. Pale yellow; thin, weak head, faint skunky aroma, pretty much sume it up. A bit more muscle compared to the average American standard, but I would agree as previously mentioned, very "Heineken like." I’ll take it over a Bud or Miller, but just barely.
doostinjcap (43) - Newport, Oregon, USA - APR 24, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Drinkable is such a good word to describe this lager. Nothing amazing, but definatly drinkable. Thats not saying very much though... because technically gasoline is drinkable. Asian Delight? I think not!
highlandlad (1443) - Blue Mountains, AUSTRALIA - APR 19, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Drinkable Chinese lager, better than some Asian contemporaries but not particularly satisfying. Straw colour, short vanishing head. Bit more aromatic hops than is typical for the region. Quenching palate. This at least has some bitterness. (Bottle)
fuyajo (229) - Portland, Oregon, USA - APR 10, 2005
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I always thought this was the Chineese equivilant of Miller/Bud, but I have a few friends that said it was really good. I ordered one at a Thai restaurant, and I knew almost instantly that my inclinations were correct. Skunky, watery, and blah. I’m not a fan these kind of lagers, and this beer reinforces that.
can8ianben (1415) - State College, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 3, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Characteristics that you don’t want in a beer are present -- tin flavour, skunky, loads of corn flavour, high carbonation... premium lager?? Oops.
ABUSEDGOAT (2417) - California, USA - APR 2, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: SEP 2, 2005 Watered down lager. This must be the Budweiser of China. Even in America this stuff isn’t very expensive. Don’t bother. There are beers that taste the same (watery) and cost less...
thegreenrooster (3606) - St.louis, Missouri, USA - APR 1, 2005
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pour is a pale yellow with a small head. Aroma is skunk with some sulfer in there. Smells like a fireworks factory. Flavor is typical lager. Heineken like in more ways than one.
DougiePhiTau (99) - USA - MAR 29, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
It is not as bad as i thought a skunk taste but taste liek a certain euro beer very poopular here. I would never buy again but not totally bad
JonR888710 (999) - Cochabamba, BOLIVIA - MAR 20, 2005
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Gold body, white foamy head. Smells of malt and rice. Very carbonated, rather bland taste. Only shows some skunked malts. Decent lager. Sampled in Beijing, China.
georgekillian (344) - Alabama, USA - MAR 18, 2005
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
i expected the worst with this beer. and trust me it is terrible. it has a nasty skunk taste to it, but it still might be better than a milwaukee’s best. only by a little though. and i love the beast