TheBeerGod (5939) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - JUN 6, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Why is it that un-/under- developed countries produce bad beer? Is it a requirement? Pours yellow - big shock there. Smells slightly skunked but otherwise sweet with notes of corn - another surprise. Taste is not too awful. Again sweet, and a bit crisp. Mild hops. Better than most of them. Finish is slightly bittersweet. Not the worst but it continues a bad trend.
Goodfella (60) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - JUN 3, 2004
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
ok, here we go. I drank this beer for one simple reason last year. It apparently was "the year of the ram" in Chinese mythology, and the greatest football team in the league is the St. Louis Rams... this was the only reason I drank the beer. Overall this beer is very simple.
dirtymike (2016) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAY 24, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Deep straw in color with a small white head.Mild skunk aroma with a touch of hops. Clean malt charcater with mild hop flavor and a clean dry finish.
desurfer (1278) - Melbourne, Florida, USA - MAY 24, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pretty much a typical light lager, crisp and clean with a medium hoppy bite. Went well with my General Tso’s chicken.
Kåstå (1273) - Mol, BELGIUM - MAY 24, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear golden blond beer with a small head. The aroma is light sweet and hoppy. The taste is rather standard lager. The bitterness is light.
Eructoblaster (3744) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - MAY 17, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Highly carbonated yellow body topped with a thick but quick fading head. Due to the green bottle, the beer exhales a skunky aroma in the first stage. Then comes a weak malty perfume. Taste is watery and lightly bitter. Palate is close to none. I am not disappointed because I wasn’t expecting more than a cheap macro lager.
oli (108) - DENMARK - MAY 17, 2004
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This has got to be one of the worst beers i ever had to suffer.Even with a chinese meal it´s so f***ing bland and boring.If this is made from spring water then the chinese authority have a serious problem with water polution.
walleye (1092) - Sterling Heights, Michigan, USA - MAY 13, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
pour yellow med size head that didn’t last little to no lacing. aroma some malts and hops and rice skunky. taste skunky with some bitterness.went well with the chinese food.This is one of those beers you want ice cold and it is better than bud.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - MAY 11, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Eh. Watery, flat and decidely undistinctive on all counts. Definite skunkiness. I can’t recommend this beer anyone, but the name is fun to say.
madquacker (1099) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - MAY 8, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
A watery mess. Bland to the dull end. Ricey ending gives a sicky sweetness. Should have known better.