MrManning (2009) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 23, 2004
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
They must really go out of their way to try to blindside us with the fancy labels and whatnot. This is one of the worst beers I have tried. Pale yellow body with tons of carbonation. Sort of like that carbonated fake apple champagne you get for the kids on New Year's. Skunky aroma with a watery barely noticable hops taste. Not recomended.
Crockett (1032) - Southampton,Ontario, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 15, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Plae gold, slightly hazy. Tiny soapy head. Fizzy mouth feel. Hops and malts are present but weak. Sweet, with some yeast and mild fruit character.
raymow (1039) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 12, 2004
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A decent European lager. A bit on the yellowish side of gold with a slightly malty aroma. Taste is fine, just nothing special.
GregClow (2976) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 4, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
I'm taking a guess that this is the right beer, since even though the bottle said Tuborg Gold Label Beer, the alcohol percentage of the one I tried (5.0%) falls between this one (5.3%) and regular Tuborg (4.6%). Whatever the case, it probably doesn't matter, as I'm sure they're both pretty crappy. Looks like carbonated apple juice with a small white head. Aroma is slightly skunky (gotta love those green bottles!) with vegetal note behind it. Light, fizzy mouthfeel. Flavour is... well, pretty much non-existant. A bit of grass, a bit of fruity malt, but it disappears quickly. I got bored before I'd finished half and dumped the rest.
Shag (2684) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - JAN 31, 2004
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Soapy shampoo aroma. Golden appearance of course. Flavor is slightly bitter with some butter and grass notes. Not a half bad lager, just be careful of the green bottle skunk.
ThomasE (5174) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JAN 28, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
If your are not going fore the alcohol, stay with the normal lager.
Both the aroma and the taste is very ordinary.
swiseman (444) - Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA - JAN 18, 2004
1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This stuff is awful. The head looks like the scum that forms on swamp water. The taste starts off sweet and ends salty. Yes, salty. I really had a hard time finishing the whole glass.
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JAN 15, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
The gold label suggests something doesn't it? I mean they spent money on presentation that suggests a special brew. Well, its a Euro lager. In the context of domestic stuff here that suggests at least a superior product to those available in Oz. I envy reviewers who can put this style down because they have real alternatives. Not a bad beer and therefore it should be scored accordingly.
weeicemon (126) - Lancaster, California, USA - JAN 1, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Light,almost greenish withever so slight maltiness. Too sweet and not very satifying. Finishes very bland.
pivo (2631) - GERMANY - DEC 23, 2003
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Weak nose of modelling clay, yellow color, scumy head. Weak thin malt body with zero bitter. Very disappointing.