RateBeer
overall
8
18
style
Brewed by Carlsberg Brewery
Style: Premium Lager
Copenhagen, Denmark
Serve in Lager glass

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 558   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.3   EST. CALORIES: 174   ABV: 5.8%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Editor’s note: sold in the US as Tuborg Premium Lager.

Danish: Guld Tuborg blev oprindeligt udviklet til eksport, og den blev lanceret herhjemme i 1895. Den er også kendt som ”Den Gyldne Dame”. Du oplever en elegant smag med god balance mellem tør fylde og livlighed. I glasset står den gyldent med hvidt skum. Duften er indtagende med anelser af frugt og en smule fennikel.

English: Tuborg Guld has always been attractive to lovely girls. As an example can it be said that at Gold-Girl was united with the marketing of Guld Tuborg already in the sixties. A beer with a sharp edge, which is characterized by its golden colour and its powerful taste. Cheers!


1.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
MrManning (2009) - Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 23, 2004
They must really go out of their way to try to blindside us with the fancy labels and whatnot. This is one of the worst beers I have tried. Pale yellow body with tons of carbonation. Sort of like that carbonated fake apple champagne you get for the kids on New Year's. Skunky aroma with a watery barely noticable hops taste. Not recomended.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Crockett (1032) - Southampton,Ontario, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 15, 2004
Plae gold, slightly hazy. Tiny soapy head. Fizzy mouth feel. Hops and malts are present but weak. Sweet, with some yeast and mild fruit character.

3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
raymow (1039) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 12, 2004
A decent European lager. A bit on the yellowish side of gold with a slightly malty aroma. Taste is fine, just nothing special.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
GregClow (2976) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 4, 2004
I'm taking a guess that this is the right beer, since even though the bottle said Tuborg Gold Label Beer, the alcohol percentage of the one I tried (5.0%) falls between this one (5.3%) and regular Tuborg (4.6%). Whatever the case, it probably doesn't matter, as I'm sure they're both pretty crappy. Looks like carbonated apple juice with a small white head. Aroma is slightly skunky (gotta love those green bottles!) with vegetal note behind it. Light, fizzy mouthfeel. Flavour is... well, pretty much non-existant. A bit of grass, a bit of fruity malt, but it disappears quickly. I got bored before I'd finished half and dumped the rest.

2.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Shag (2684) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - JAN 31, 2004
Soapy shampoo aroma. Golden appearance of course. Flavor is slightly bitter with some butter and grass notes. Not a half bad lager, just be careful of the green bottle skunk.

1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
ThomasE (5174) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JAN 28, 2004
If your are not going fore the alcohol, stay with the normal lager. Both the aroma and the taste is very ordinary.

1
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
swiseman (444) - Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA - JAN 18, 2004
This stuff is awful. The head looks like the scum that forms on swamp water. The taste starts off sweet and ends salty. Yes, salty. I really had a hard time finishing the whole glass.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JAN 15, 2004
The gold label suggests something doesn't it? I mean they spent money on presentation that suggests a special brew. Well, its a Euro lager. In the context of domestic stuff here that suggests at least a superior product to those available in Oz. I envy reviewers who can put this style down because they have real alternatives. Not a bad beer and therefore it should be scored accordingly.

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
weeicemon (126) - Lancaster, California, USA - JAN 1, 2004
Light,almost greenish withever so slight maltiness. Too sweet and not very satifying. Finishes very bland.

1.5
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
pivo (2631) - GERMANY - DEC 23, 2003
Weak nose of modelling clay, yellow color, scumy head. Weak thin malt body with zero bitter. Very disappointing.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 45 46 47  48  49 50 51 » 56


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50