Sammy (8760) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 20, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
There is some hop burps here and a decent white head on top of pale yellow. Nothing attractive about the scent. OK serviceable with above average carbonation. Not too malty, but not noticeable hop effect. There are far better Polish beers within reach.
faroeviking (10289) - FAROE ISLANDS - FEB 25, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Can. Golden colour with a medium mostly lasting white head. Aroma of hops and grains. Flavour of hops, grains and malt. Bitter hoppy finish.
Lunkie (1431) - Glen Iris, AUSTRALIA - JAN 28, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Sweet fruit malt aroma. Yellow clear colour with poor head nad lacing. Sweet malt flavour. Flat palate.
chmurarz (518) - Legnica POLAND, POLAND - JAN 27, 2007
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: MAY 25, 2007 500ml bottle, light golden colour, head not lasting, white and weak; small bubbles, aroma; something artificial like any other medium class premium, balanced strong hops and malt(aroma very nice) flavour, nothing more than hops with sofr malt base, a bit tangy, medium bodied
holdenn (2080) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 24, 2007
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
500 ml bottle. So how do you rate a pale lager, or "premium" in this case. I don’t really know what to compare it to. A pale lager can only be so good, and by so I mean not very. But for the style and what they are attempting, what they want this beer to be, i’ll give it a shot. Clear sparkling yellow-gold color with a tall white head. hmm ... that’s what it is supposed to be. Appearance: 5 Hay/straw grain aroma, that’s what these beers usually are, it doesn’t offend me but but man its not very appealing either. Aroma 4 Sweet flavors ... something funky, a little skunky, grain, barely noticeable bitterness. Flavor 3. Dry watery finish. Palate 2. Now the overall, I can drink it, I don’t really want to, but I can if i think of it as closer to water than beer. Well there ya go. 9
drewbeerme (3879) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 23, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
bottle. huge thanks to holdenn for cracking this i couldn’t believe my eyes when he pulled this...okay just kidding. clear straw color with straw, hay, and skunky nose. taste has some mild sweetness, stale cereal and hops. reminds me of miller.
BelgianBeerGal (3203) - Panama City, Florida, USA - JAN 23, 2007
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JUN 22, 2009 Bottled at Trap’s in Rohl. Nothing remarkable. Poured yellow with a good head, but it quickly disapperared. Slight apricot scent in the aroma. Drink this beer cold!
beergut111 (210) - Berlin, GERMANY - JAN 15, 2007
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Yellow color with a decent head. Not bad for a lager, I can actually taste some hops. It was free , I wouldnt pay for it.
RobBestwick (590) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - JAN 13, 2007
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottled. Clean but not very strong aroma, golden hue with a small head. Reasonably hoppy lager taste, quite dry with hint of bitterness in the finish. An ok lager.
thegreenrooster (3243) - St.louis, Missouri, USA - JAN 9, 2007
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pour is yellow with a fizzy white head. Aroma is unmistakable pale lager. Some grain and corn. Flavor is grassy and dry. If you had one eastern Euro lager you had them all.