JFGrind (1859) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2005
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bought a twelve pack in Binghamton, NY for under five bucks. Piss water appearance with short foam, and few bubbles. Iíll give it extra points for being a classic beer resurrected, but its "absolutely chemical tasting swill".
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUN 28, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Chris always talks about the good old days of Shulz and Duli (sp?), so when I found this at a beverage store near the beach in North Carolina, I just had to get some to share wth him. Itís basically a light lager with not too much of an adjunct presence, well carbonated, a very little bit of hop dryness at the end.
joehribar@hhsgov (2) - Alexandria, Virginia, USA - JUN 14, 2005 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Great beer., great taste not bloating I wish I could find it in northern VA.
DYCSoccer17 (3354) - Woodland, California, USA - MAY 28, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Can. Grassy, sour skunked yeast in the nose. Pretty darn sour nose. Transparent apple juice color with a small quickly dissipating false white head. Start is kind of sweet turning sour and metallic to finish. A strange bitterness lingers....Pretty rough stuff...
MikeT (76) - Hollis, New Hampshire, USA - APR 28, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 16, 2008 A blond pur with typical carbonated head and lace. A slightly sweet aroma that brings back memories of past days in upstate NY and SU. Not bad for a mass produced beer.
The new version of this beer is rather smooth and creamy and the "headache in every beer" is gone!
scooter122983 (17) - West Des Moines, Iowa, USA - MAR 28, 2005
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A pale lager with a little hoppy taste and a quicky diminshing head also a little flat tasting. I hope that other beers from New York arent influenced by this brew.
GirlyBeer (190) - Old Orchard Beach, Maine, USA - FEB 10, 2005
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUN 3, 2005 I like Utica Club. Could be genetic because my father and grandmother grew up drinking it. Most people I know seem to think itís pretty bad. I find it quite tasty.
BrewEd (182) - Wilmington, North Carolina, USA - JAN 25, 2005
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
The aromawas really the high point with hints of malt and a hoppy presence. Taste was definitely downhill from the aroma - a bland, sweet, watered-down, malt liquor flavor. I canít say this was a really bad beer - it just lacked any real distinction or quality.
Osgood (6) - Utica, New York, USA - NOV 24, 2004 does not count
4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
I enjoy this beer quite a bit. My partiality to this beer could be because that iím a Utican myself or it could be the delectable taste for such a low price.
mongkut4 (132) - Florida, USA - AUG 8, 2004
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
One of the worst beers Iíve had the misfortune to pour down my throat. Iím not sure what they were trying to create but if it was swill, they succeeded.