RateBeer
overall
5
46
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
available

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 128   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.08   EST. CALORIES: 156   ABV: 5.2%
Share this beer with friends!
No commercial description


3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
Maximus55 (40) - California, USA - AUG 3, 2004
Oh come on people this stuff aint that bad now hehehehe, You shold at least give it a try and if you donít like it then you at least tried it. Itís cheap itll get you drunk, have fun.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
shadey (1903) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - JUN 24, 2004
pee pee in a can. If you had ever been to Utica, you would understand. It needs to be cheap and it needs to keep you drunk. The taste takes a very distant third.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
VTHopHead (1511) - Barre, Vermont, USA - MAY 30, 2004
Earlier comments mentioned its similarity to a malt liquor and I agree. A valid attempt at a balance with a dry, slightly bitter finish.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Timbowl2 (10) - USA - NOV 10, 2003
At first tasta, i had concieved this beer to be a malt liqour. It had a flavour that was much to sweet for my liking, and the aroma followed suit. it did have a very nice appearance, however.

2.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 10/20
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 20, 2003
This beer pours with a golden body topped by a thin white head with some lacing. The aroma is slightly sweet and rather well balanced between malt and hops. A slight tomato aroma is detected. The flavor is slightly sweet and malty with a touch of grassy hops and a touch of tomato like character. Light bodied and smooth yet slightly dry.

0.8
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
ClarkVV (3892) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - JUN 3, 2003
Spoiled yeast taste to begin, but it evens out a bit. Lacked the old malt taste because it was drowned out by an old and diluted hop taste. . .

1.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 4/20
manolager (20) - Kansas, USA - MAY 15, 2003
Harsh start, pop like carb, no real body, not smooth, little taste to speak of...and I had it on draft in Utica! Stick with Saranac labels.

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
ConiseurofBeer (242) - Downingtown, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 29, 2003
All the characteristics of shitty beer, with twice the shits.

3.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 17/20
Obie99 (1) - USA - JAN 8, 2003 does not count
I love this beer. I really, really love this beer. The only bad things that I can say about it is that it has made my head pound once or twice, and that the Matt family never should have changed the old Shultz & Dooley label to the new flashy one. Donít judge Uncle Charlie until youíve drank this beer out of a bottle IN UTICA.

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
Gearwar (56) - Rochester, New Hampshire, USA - OCT 9, 2002
This stuff is great


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  11  12 13


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50