Filthmuppet (33) - Newtown, AUSTRALIA - DEC 11, 2002
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
What can you say about such an old and faithful friend? We had some great times togeather and our paths will cross again. Love you
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - DEC 10, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
I’ve been having this a lot in the past few weeks for some unknown reason, i’ve always hated it, ever since my first bottle when i was 15 or so, smells like vomit, doesn’t taste much better, but at least it has some flavour, even if it isn’t good flavour. Lots of chemically flavours in there.
DOdubble (92) - UVA, Virginia, USA - DEC 8, 2002
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
My friend came back from a semester abroad in australia, she brought some of this w/ her. Said this is a cheap beer there. It went down real nice and smooth, i could probably drink a bunch real fast.
Catadobe (112) - AUSTRALIA - DEC 8, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Cut my teeth on this beer and growing up it was one that filled the gap nicely. I have grown up now though and moved on to much better brews. Still have a soft spot for it though.
Hildigöltur (5103) - København, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A standard lager. Light and not very bitter flavour.
Mads Langtved (2245) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2002
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nothing special. Quite watery and thin, eventhough I drank it after the consumption of Chimay Grand Reserve. Wonder why?
Ungstrup (29484) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - DEC 3, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
A golden beer with an OK yet fast disappearing head. The aroma is slightly hoppy. The taste is refreshing, a little more bitter than the average lager and with hints of honey which makes it just a bit better than the average lager. It’s not nearly as good now, as it was, 6 years ago, when I first tasted it in Sydney - maybe the setting and all the beers drunk since has an influence here?
MAP (1133) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - DEC 1, 2002
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bad skunk nose, no palate, no real flavor, no complexity, a waste of time and money.
necromessiah99 (5) - melbourne, AUSTRALIA - NOV 27, 2002 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
horrid redneck beer...smells like vomit and doesnt taste much better....abomination how this is called an ale... for ppl who cant afford or are to braindead for real beer
akinm (282) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 5, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Now I know it is true all around the world that it is not always quality that sells but money and advertising can do the trick. The USA has its Budweiser and apparently Australia has its Victoria Bitter.