Nanger (6) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - AUG 1, 2003 does not count
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Another drab beer from the company that has wrecked Australians good taste in beer.
I stopped drinking it a long time ago, i think it was when thay started putting dirty dishwashing water in it. Well thats what it tastes like anyway!
groundfisher (1) - AUSTRALIA - JUL 31, 2003 does not count
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
This isn't such a good beer. However, this is a very inexpensive beer. It is very good for its price - when you buy a cheap beer you know what to expect.
steasa (12) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - JUL 27, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: AUG 7, 2003 Thin,overfizzed brewed soft drink.Very evident overuse of mollasses/sugar cane which comes through in the taste.Slight hint of weak hops in the taste.Extremely sweet and sickly.Awful!
fiulijn (18101) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 4, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Golden color. Simple aroma, almost stinking. Very simple body and watery final. Drinkable, useless.
SilkTork (5507) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Hampshire, ENGLAND - JUL 2, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Kinda creamy and flavoursome, like inhaling snot on a warm summer's day.
Dredd (779) - Bentleigh, AUSTRALIA - JUN 25, 2003
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
well, this just gets worse with age. This is a cheap beer that is brewed with what I can assume is way too much cane sugar/sucrose which produces bad mouthfeel. There is a bit of variance with batches where some produce reasonable head to no head. If drunk at a temperature above 1 degree C, it is almost undrinkable, and more than 6 WILL guarantee a hangover. Absolutely no redeeming features apart from the fact you can guzzle it without feeling too bloated. Oh, the colour is close to a normal beer, so the appearence is OK.
Hansen (8244) - Assentoft, DENMARK - JUN 17, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Yellow and not much head. Not much going on either in aroma or flavor. I think it's ok if it's cold and you need something cold and neutrally tasting.
TipsyMcStager (1139) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - JUN 11, 2003
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Aroma of wet socks - wait, socks that you treked through a swamp with and didn't wash for 3 months. Pours a light yellow, flat and no head. A palate in the nano measurement scale. Bitter? The only one who's bitter is Tipsy at Presario for subjecting me to another classic.
presario (4902) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - JUN 11, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Very little aroma. Clean, slightly dark yellow. Average white head. Bitter, in a bad way, thin, with a taste reminiscent of gas fumes. I thought this was a famous beer and all I can say is I'm glad I didn't buy a 6-pack.
leaparsons (9544) - Wigston, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - JUN 9, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Mmmm, a faint trace of aroma. Looks like a flat lager. Oh, I see - its not a bitter its a "bitter lager". Gassy and with the character of soda water this is thin and poor.