DOdubble (92) - UVA, Virginia, USA - DEC 8, 2002
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
My friend came back from a semester abroad in australia, she brought some of this w/ her. Said this is a cheap beer there. It went down real nice and smooth, i could probably drink a bunch real fast.
Catadobe (112) - AUSTRALIA - DEC 8, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Cut my teeth on this beer and growing up it was one that filled the gap nicely. I have grown up now though and moved on to much better brews. Still have a soft spot for it though.
Hildigöltur (5104) - Křbenhavn, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A standard lager. Light and not very bitter flavour.
Mads Langtved (2244) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2002
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nothing special. Quite watery and thin, eventhough I drank it after the consumption of Chimay Grand Reserve. Wonder why?
Ungstrup (30468) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - DEC 3, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
A golden beer with an OK yet fast disappearing head. The aroma is slightly hoppy. The taste is refreshing, a little more bitter than the average lager and with hints of honey which makes it just a bit better than the average lager. It’s not nearly as good now, as it was, 6 years ago, when I first tasted it in Sydney - maybe the setting and all the beers drunk since has an influence here?
MAP (1133) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - DEC 1, 2002
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bad skunk nose, no palate, no real flavor, no complexity, a waste of time and money.
necromessiah99 (5) - melbourne, AUSTRALIA - NOV 27, 2002 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
horrid redneck beer...smells like vomit and doesnt taste much better....abomination how this is called an ale... for ppl who cant afford or are to braindead for real beer
akinm (282) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 5, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Now I know it is true all around the world that it is not always quality that sells but money and advertising can do the trick. The USA has its Budweiser and apparently Australia has its Victoria Bitter.
dins (266) - Texas, USA - OCT 2, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Watery, outside of having alcohol in it I’m not sure of anything positive to say about it outside of that fact that it didn’t make me vomit.
Hen0199 (8) - na, AUSTRALIA - SEP 24, 2002 does not count
4.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
Stuff Fosters mate this is awesome