Hen0199 (8) - na, AUSTRALIA - SEP 24, 2002 does not count
4.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
Stuff Fosters mate this is awesome
Linc (739) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - SEP 13, 2002
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is pretty bad stuff but at least it has some flavour, and it doesn’t taste bad enough to make you feel like you’re struggling just to finish your glass.
johninmelb (1127) - Bristol, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - SEP 8, 2002
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JUL 23, 2003 I confess to a personal prejudice on this one. It was the first beer I ever drank, being introduced to it by my brother. It is still one of the best beers when you have - as the ad says - "a hard-earned thirst". Goes down pleasantly, easily and quickly. One of the few lagers that doesn't turn on you no matter how much of it you drink.
pivo (2646) - GERMANY - SEP 5, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is a perfect beer: perfects "2s" for my rating. Smells a little fart-like. Light gold color and a surprisingly reasonable taste given the nose on this thing. Thin body. I paid WAY too much for this: 1.85 Euro (about $1.85 at the time of purchase) for a .33 liter can.
YogiBeera (2554) - New Jersey, USA - SEP 1, 2002
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Yuck! Skunky and citrus-y aroma. Yellow and no head, not much to say about this beer, but the flavor left me look like a chimpanzee with showing its teeth!
OlJuntan64 (1265) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - AUG 29, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pale gold clear under a small short lasting head that still manages to generate some lace. Bitter sappy woody hops aroma. Medium rawish metallic bitter palate with a touch of corn syrup sweetness. Start has some character and is decently carbonated but a weak middle, and hint of paint thinner finish and after taste are disappointing.
Davhgbrew (948) - Seattle, Washington, USA - AUG 29, 2002
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 12/20
Decent lager, but not much of a bitter. Drinkable nontheless.
JamesAnatidae99 (2) - Brevard, North Carolina, USA - AUG 18, 2002 does not count
3.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
Best of beers I tired during my trip to Australia. I must say it’s better than our cheap beers over here. Wish it was sold in the U.S.
madsberg (11069) - Søborg, DENMARK - AUG 12, 2002
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: APR 13, 2003 Bottled: Lager, with not much character. Has some bitterness, but it is way too waterish and uninteresting.
LoveCaissa (873) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - AUG 9, 2002
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JAN 10, 2003 Surely intended to quench one"s thirst. Looks like the average lager with a white and quickly dissipating head. The initial flavour did NOT please me, but the finish is better: some hop bitterness with an almost fruity character. Still we need some serious global warming before I feel like buying this again here in Denmark!