beerguy101 (5244) - Newark, California, USA - JAN 27, 2003
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Golden color, slightly hazy. Medium head. Aroma is fruity and a touch floral. Big bold beer with complex flavors. Tastes like a triple wit. Sweet and spicy with fruity and yeasty flavors. Sour apples, grapefruit, mango, coriander and etc etc. Tart and sweet. Both malts and hops and sweet and tart nicely balanced. Very tasty beer. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly sweet and tart.
ConiseurofBeer (242) - Downingtown, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 27, 2003
3.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Not really taken with the aroma, but that is pretty much all I don't like about it. Nice look smooth flavor, hides the 9.5% alcohol very well.
robertjm (718) - Albany, California, USA - JAN 14, 2003
2.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Someone tell me that I got a bad sixpack please!! Iíve had two bottles now, and both of them taste like someone mixed grapefruit juice in with it. (And NOT the sweet pink version either). The beer itself seems a bit cloudy too, like thereís something in solution. No head to speak of. Donít detect any clove at all. At $10.99 a six-pack here (California) I am disappointed.
kujo9 (1090) - North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA - JAN 10, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
For a non Belgian brewed tripel, this was not a bad attempt. Color is a nice deep golden but no head or brusselís lace. It may be knocked down by the alcohol, but upon swirling the glass, it doesnít seem as though it has enough malt to kick up a good bit of head. Itís clovey and citrusy with touch of fruitiness and alcohol, but seems to lack a little bit of depth in the aroma to be a classic tripel. Same goes for the flavor. It finishes bittersweet with a very slight hop flavor. The body seems a little heavy for a tripel which might also be due to carbonation on the low end of the scale. Iím used to having basically what I call an explosive level of carbonation in a tripel. Explosive in the mouth, not the bottle. The flavor lacks the the depth of complexity to be a true classic tripel, but this is a very nice beer from an American brewery.
CaptainCougar (7129) - Columbia, Maryland, USA - JAN 10, 2003
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: FEB 9, 2004 2/9/04: I gotta admit that I really wasn't a big fan of this when I first had it. It seems that aging it a little over a year has increased its balance and texture. Pours a cloudy golden with a lacey white head. Good caramely sweetness and authentic Belgian yeasty flavor. Nice complexity as well, and the spices seem to have mellowed. A nice tripel.
1/10/03: Interesting sweet and sour aroma coming from the cloudy lightly fizzy body. Syrupy flavor that starts sweet, turns slightly alcoholic and finishes with a strange earthiness, or perhaps it just the spices I'm tasting. Overly sweet, but not undrinkable and the alcohol is hidden fairly well. Not bad for a non-Belgian brewery though.
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - JAN 5, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
The label claims this is brewed in the tripel style, but it doesnít hold a candle to the V10. Itís decent, but lacks the depth of flavor of the V10. Very good for a year round type bottled beer, but if Iím in the mood for belgian styles, Iíd rather spend the same money on a single bottle of something really amazing.
JasonG (776) - Salt Lake City, Utah, USA - JAN 3, 2003
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: OCT 9, 2003 re-rate: Cloudy, straw yellow color w/ a medium sized white head. aroma has honey and malt, sweet, with alcohol notable but nicely blended (not overwhelming). Flavor is smooth and well balanced (especially for a high grav beer), malty, with belgian sugar and honey notable, slightly spicey, with a warming alcohol undertone throughout. If I had to complain, I'd say it's a little too sweet. But overall a great brew.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 31, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
This was a great beer. A little on the sweet side but still worth seeking out.
booyaatribe (453) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 31, 2002
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Whatís all the hype about? Now, I admit itís quite nice for an american belgian-style. But thereís a disappointing, vegetable-y off note, and it doesnít have quite the light finish Iíd want from a belgian.
MrRomero (1973) - Nolanville, USA - DEC 30, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Light orange. Non-lasting head. Subtle spiciness. Alcohol is well masked. Sweet finish. Good but not great.