RateBeer
overall
90
83
style
Serve in Tulip

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 400   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.52/5   EST. CALORIES: 204   ABV: 6.8%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Malt beverage with natural flavors


3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
ttoadee (1110) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 5, 2015
Bottle 2015. Light gold pour, a small white head with some coaxing, Nose is muddled spice and malt. Bittersweet. Middle is some smooth Pils malt, citrus and herbs. Finish is hint of sweet malt gently stepped over by some subtle drying hop flavors. Nice.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
OldMrCrow (2243) - Seattle, Washington, USA - AUG 5, 2015
Tap at the Watershed.

Five years after suffering through the liquid sack of shit that was the first iteration of this beer, I both forgot the experience and was paying insufficient attention at the bar and failed to notice that DFH was involved in this one. Either would have stopped me short. But since some of the other Stone collaborations have been tolerable and the Watershed was having a special event around this beer, I ordered a glass. Terrible mistake. It brought back memories from the first time around, when I surmised Now we know that DFH only needs a 1/3 share in the making to f*** up a beer with their wannabe-edgy "creativity". Yep, five years later the order of the brewers and location is different but essentially nothing changed. The recipe is still awful, still some great aunt’s bathroom potpourri atop which might be something like a sticky saison, but who knows.

It was all predictable. I really wonder why Stone and Victory let themselves be dragged down like this. Even more, I wonder how Isabelle Proximus managed not to suck, let alone how it managed to be one of the best beers I’ve had. (Actually, I know the answer to that, but I probably shouldn’t say it here.) This may not be as horrible as the stone version but 2.4 I was too generous to it. I’m going 2.1 today.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
portableparty (2257) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - JUL 30, 2015
12 oz. bottle. Pours a clear golden color with a very quick white soapy head that fades to a wispy film and collar. Aroma is big spice flowers like lavender and coriander. Taste is more the same with a nice farmyard saison coming through the end. Palate is thin crisp and fizzy. Not bad at all!

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
tennisjoel (1271) - Rochester, Minnesota, USA - JUL 29, 2015
Golden pour with minimal head. Aroma of vegatables, lemon, citrus, herbal. Off flavor that detracts. Somewhat dry palate. The one thing that I don’t like is there is an artificial component to this beer, perhaps it is the spices used. While not overpowering, it is still present. Lower tier in the saison style, for me at least.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
GenDV138 (4591) - Falls Church, Virginia, USA - JUL 28, 2015
12 oz bottle poured into a Spiegelau tulip. Clear light golden yellow with a finger of off-white head. Aromas of herbs, spice, light citrus and funk. Tastes of herbs including rosemary and thyme, spice, light funk, some citrus fruit and peel. Medium body with a dry finish. Tasty herbaceous saison.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 14/20
radio_nowhere (1287) - Maryland, USA - JUL 26, 2015
Bottle into tulip glass, hazy darker golden color with white head. Aroma notes of farmhouse yeast, pale malt sweetness, parsley, citrus and light spices. Taste adds bread, sage, rosemary, lemon zest, mild fruit, somewhat tangy, grass and light pine/earthy bitterness. Medium-light body, moderate carbonation, soft with herbal sweet finish. Can’t compare to other variants but this is nice complex saison.

2.4
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
DCLawyer (2313) - Falls Church, Virginia, USA - JUL 22, 2015
Finally decided to taste the third version of the collab beer, after having not liked the other two. Indeed, these beers were a large part of why I initially shied away from saisons as a whole style, which was stupid of me but still. Bottle->tulip. Bright gold with big frothy white head. A: tons of herbal spice, grains. T: herbs and spices. Too much spice cabinet buffet in here for me. Yuck.

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
Stuu666 (8356) - Edinburgh, SCOTLAND - MAR 11, 2015
Bottle in Brewdog Edinburgh. Pours golden yellow, nose is lemon, herbal, vanilla, taste is similar, floral, dry.

3.7
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
OneHotPepper (84) - - OCT 2, 2014
From a bottle, medium gold in color. Smells tangy and herbal. Tart and fresh at first sip with strong rosemary notes. Refreshing and perfect herbal saison. ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
slowrunner77 (8395) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 1, 2014
same base recipe as the Stone and DFH versions, but the aroma was all skunk...and in a brown bottle nonetheless. flavor much better, but definitely different. not sure what they did different in the process, but easily the weakest of the three. 2012 release an improvement...still my least favorite of the 3, but better


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2  3  4 5 6 » 40


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50