RateBeer
overall
91
83
style
Serve in Tulip

bottled
common

on tap
available

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 388   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.52   EST. CALORIES: 204   ABV: 6.8%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Malt beverage with natural flavors


streve's rating

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
streve (105) - Maryland, USA - NOV 19, 2012
12oz bottle. Pour was a golden color, half a finger of white head and mild carbonation. Aroma of hops, citrus, yeast and some spice. Mouth is moderately bitter, very sweet and fruity. Orange and lemon. Refreshing and fairly light. Nice.


3.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
thegreenrooster (3570) - St.louis, Missouri, USA - AUG 29, 2015
Pour is a cloudy yellow with a large white head. Aroma Is very herbal aromatic. Like walking into a spice market. Lots of thyme, sage and rosemary. Flavor is more of the saison aspect with the herbs in the backround. Plenty of fruity yeasty esters with the herbs showing up after the swallow. Not your typical saison but I do like all the herbs added I only wish they stood out a bit more in the flavor.

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
gripweed57 (1001) - Hamilton Square, New Jersey, USA - AUG 28, 2015
12 ounce bottle. Pours a light yellow gold color with a small creamy white head. Aroma is sweet malt with notes of lemon verbena and sage. The flavor is more lemon with notes of thyme and rosemary. Malty sweet with some spicy hop bitterness.

3.6
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
Maverick34 (2624) - New York, USA - AUG 22, 2015
Bottled. Slight cloud orange yellow. Lots of herbs and such. Slight yeast funk edge. Decent.

4
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
commonshawn (676) - Minnesota, USA - AUG 22, 2015
Tap at Butcher and boar with commonmac. Tulip glass. Light clear gold with small white head. Very herby nose. Resin and oil. The herb bitterness works well with the hop and alcohol. Really nice and just different enough.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
milewide (1751) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - AUG 11, 2015
Should there be 4 separate listings for "saison du buff"??? Too much alcohol and bitterness for a saison.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
TXBadger (1970) - Dallas, Texas, USA - AUG 11, 2015
Pours a hazy light yellow golden color with white head. Yeast, wheat, light fruit , and grass on the nose; follows onto the palate. Light bodied. Finishes with a wheat note.

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
jkwalking05 (4231) - Arlington, Texas, USA - AUG 7, 2015
12 oz bottle. Golden with a light haze and a decent white head. Aroma is of straw, herbal, earth and light citrus. Taste is of black pepper, herbal, straw, and citrus.

3.3
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
travita (4435) - Frisco, Texas, USA - AUG 7, 2015
Bottle. The look is mostly clear, thin white head, and golden in color. The smell is herbal, perfume, thyme, pleasant, maybe a little heavy. The taste is herbal, sweet, perfume, a little too much.

3.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
ttoadee (1011) - Austin, Texas, USA - AUG 5, 2015
Bottle 2015. Light gold pour, a small white head with some coaxing, Nose is muddled spice and malt. Bittersweet. Middle is some smooth Pils malt, citrus and herbs. Finish is hint of sweet malt gently stepped over by some subtle drying hop flavors. Nice.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
OldMrCrow (2178) - Seattle, Washington, USA - AUG 5, 2015
Tap at the Watershed.

Five years after suffering through the liquid sack of shit that was the first iteration of this beer, I both forgot the experience and was paying insufficient attention at the bar and failed to notice that DFH was involved in this one. Either would have stopped me short. But since some of the other Stone collaborations have been tolerable and the Watershed was having a special event around this beer, I ordered a glass. Terrible mistake. It brought back memories from the first time around, when I surmised Now we know that DFH only needs a 1/3 share in the making to f*** up a beer with their wannabe-edgy "creativity". Yep, five years later the order of the brewers and location is different but essentially nothing changed. The recipe is still awful, still some great aunt’s bathroom potpourri atop which might be something like a sticky saison, but who knows.

It was all predictable. I really wonder why Stone and Victory let themselves be dragged down like this. Even more, I wonder how Isabelle Proximus managed not to suck, let alone how it managed to be one of the best beers I’ve had. (Actually, I know the answer to that, but I probably shouldn’t say it here.) This may not be as horrible as the stone version but 2.4 I was too generous to it. I’m going 2.1 today.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4 » 39


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50