TheEpeeist (3371) - Media, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 9, 2006
4.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 20/20
.33 L bottle at the Tap House in Norfolk. Chocolate brown with thin creamy head. Whiff of flowers, malts; so gentle. Incredibly balanced taste. A flavor like other Belgians Iíve had but super refined. I can see what the others were striving for. Curiously recognizable but almost as if from a dream. Once youíre immersed the 12 goes down just like water. Buzz creeps in half way through; makes me happy. I think I could drink these continuously for a few days. Not the beast I expected but a Shakespearean achievement of fermentation. A keystone of western culture.
Deanos (4) - ENGLAND - MAR 9, 2006 does not count
4.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Why try and apply words to this great beer? It tastes SO MUCH, that i passed out while my brain tried to process all of the data from my taste buds. Obviously, this is a lie, but this beer is seriously great. Anyone that says that itís overhyped is trying to be sensational.
TheDog (528) - Aarhus, DENMARK - MAR 8, 2006
3.7 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 20, 2007 The best beer in the world? Not mine. Rich of flavor, taste and finish but way too much alcohol taste. Too much hype around this beer. Value for money and choose St.bernadus abt12 instead. same recipe, yeast and water. St.bernadus brewed until 1993 westvletern...
GBBTBILL (1) - San Diego, California, USA - MAR 8, 2006 does not count
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
A beer worth traveling to Belgium to drink. Just back from the Great Belgian Beer Tour - we traveled from Brussels to Westvleterenís In de Vrede Cafe for a tasting of the 12 the 8 and the blonde
yngwie (13693) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - MAR 6, 2006
4.5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Bottled. Rating #500. Iíve waited quite patiently for this one. It has been in my cellar since september, and I decided when I bought it that I should save it for rating #500. I think I have entered my 499 beers quite rapidly, just over six months, but the waiting has been way to long, and the beer has been staring at me every time I went to get another beer in the cellar. Now, as I am to open it, I am a little bit nervous. Itís not my virgin-sample of a Westy 12, Iíve had it two or three times before, I am just nervous that it might be bad in any way, or that I might get disappointed. After all, my taste-buds has evolved a little since my first rating. It has a BB date of 28.02.08, so it is ok in that way, hope it is in any other way too. Well, off goes the cap. The first aroma is very vinous and oaked. Then, when itís poured, black currant, caramel, dried fruits, light alcohol, spices and a light yeastiness comes through. You donít get it much more complex than this. It looks gorgeous, dark reddish-brown and sparkling, and with some sediments if you prefer that. It has probably the most dense, lasting head that Iíve seen so far, beige in color, and huge. The flavor is rich, with caramel, candi-sweetness, malt, spices, bitterness, cherry and alcohol. Too much alcohol, I think. There are lots of other beers masking the 10% ABV much better, but it is not an unpleasant alcohol-level. The body is full and it has a sweet and bitter finish that is quite long. The flavor and finish is rounded of as the beer warms up, and my starting temperature of 10įC was too cold, especially for the finish to step forward. It turned out I had no reason to be nervous, the beer probably deserves its first place on Ratebeer, but I expected that I could give it a higher score. A beer that matches aroma and flavor even better will hopefully come my way some day, and then maybe the perfect 5 will be given. (060306)
Numenor (871) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAR 2, 2006
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: MAR 4, 2006 Taphouse in Norfolk -- Iíll admit, I never thought Iíd rate another beer above a 4.4, but there you go. A perfect dark cherry appearance with a nice ivroy head. The aroma is very silky, almost not there and highly delicate. Amazing taste of cherry, chocolate and many other flavors, too complex to be able to identify. If one can call any beer liquid silk this would be it. The Westy 12 was well worth the wait, though Iíll admit that the Rochefort 10 is a very close second and far more economical. This beer ends with a nice warming effect all thoughout the mouth and throat.
gputty (456) - Virgina Beach, Virginia, USA - FEB 26, 2006
4.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Got to experience this beverage with Immy at the Taphouse in Norfolk. A lot of anticipation leading up to the first sip, and I was not let down. "Grape juice of the Gods" kept running through my mind. Pours a dark brown, maybe a hint of red, with a small tan head that dissipated. Vinous nose, almost like a red wine. This is definitely a beer to savor, as I still do not have a handle on the complexities of the flavor. Suffice to say though, this is wonderful stuff!
smcd (366) - USA - FEB 26, 2006
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: MAR 8, 2006 Being obliged to rate this beer seems apparently necessary ... I like W.12. I do. I wouldnít rate it as the best beer in the world. But it is delicious. Note, however, that this is a "vintage" product -- some years are better than others and it changes with age.
(Bottled. 03/2006). This batch seems "green". Body is relatively thin compared to past experiences with this brew. All the same major notes as described below but the body definitely seems thinner warranting a slight "downgrade" in the overall impression.
(Earlier notes) Pours dark, dark brown. Complex aromas of dried fruits, nuts, and biscuits. An intense flavor that emerges as it warms up. A wonderful experience to be sure. Vintages vary ... a "4" would be a "4.5" for some years and something less in others.
Immy (1955) - Virginia Beach, USA - FEB 22, 2006
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
FINALLY! Had mine at the Taphouse in the Ghent section of Norfolk, VA with gputty. Even brought my own glass for the occasion.
Many things in life do not come close to matching their "hype". Fortunately, I feel this one goes beyond the considerable buzz surrounding it.
Pours into my trappist glass a deep mahogany brownish red. Somewhat murky, a slight, off white head crowns the top, a foreshadow of the weblike dense lacing. Initially, the nose is rather vinous, like a medium red, with some cherry notes peeking through. As it warms, a far more complex aroma emerges. Notes of dark fruits - raisin and black cherries - shine through. The cornucopia of scents is almost overwhelming, too much going on to pinpoint all the complexities.
Finally, I lift the glass and draw my first sip. Light Muscatine grapes cascade across my tongue to start the show, followed by a textbook quad fruitiness, highlighted by black cherry, prune and some light molasses. All this flies by you as the finish approaches, a lovely sweet, slightly tart mildly dry epilogue.
All too soon, I see the tiny logo at the bottom of my glass, signaling the beginning of the end. Fully warmed, the alcohol becomes just slightly more apparent, and some of the initial winelike notes have faded to a warm, sweet end. Sad but sated, I give this my first 5.
Holdwine (1077) - Beertimore, Maryland, USA - FEB 20, 2006
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Thanks Max. Well, now I have tasted the best. Wonderful mix of fruitcake flavors, all spicy and warm. 10.2%? nicely hidden. Super complex with notes and tastes flying everywhere. Hard to imagine such variety in a single beer. Almost unassuming as you drink in the monkís labor. Then when finished you sit back and smile...