bocefus (9) - Portland, Oregon, USA - FEB 28, 2007 does not count
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
I have had this in bottle and tap and I would have have to say the tap was significantly better. Very sweet honey flavor, smooth, very easy to drink not bitter at all.
manshow (8) - Spokane, Washington, USA - APR 9, 2004 does not count
4.4 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 18/20
On tap or in bottle this is a beer you dont want to miss out on. Creamy and bitterly sweet, if you can actually put that all together. Nice ale to sit down and enjoy.
humuluslupulus (7) - USA - JUN 9, 2006 does not count
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I have good memories of this one. sweet and very mild.
(im uploading some old mental notes of mine on 100+ beers to this site so iíll keep it simple, and retaste soon)
stock66 (7) - Bay City, Texas, USA - SEP 6, 2007 does not count
2.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
From bottle. Poured amber with little, quick dissolving head. First taste of apricots (!?). Nice start with a dissappointing, watery finish. Overall not bad. A good "lawnmower" beer.
jimmyjack (7) - USA - JUL 5, 2009 does not count
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Was not tasting to rate, but this is my feel from memory. Yellow color with med head, somewhat thin body with subtle hops. Has a mass-produced feel to the mouth, and affects my body like a cheaper ale. Probably due to sugar. drinkable but not my favorite on tap. From Indigo Alley in Fernandina, a nice neighborhood pub.
blanchjoe (5) - Portland, Alabama, USA - AUG 15, 2010 does not count
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
One of my personal favorites. Made here in Portland, OR, not fancy beer, not a complex beer, not a "full" bodied beer, but a simple, drinkable and a beer that goes with different foods easily, and most importantly it is a beer that one does not get tired of drinking.
gavriend (5) - - NOV 24, 2013 does not count
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Mild taste and spell. Very easy to drink and has a milky aftertaste that diminishes quickly
Tleblanc87 (4) - New York, USA - MAY 26, 2010 does not count
4.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
We just started carrying this beer on tap where I work. I was skeptical because Iím not a huge fan of the widmer drifter pale ale, however this beer is pretty good. I really enjoyed the honey characteristic it leaves after swallowed.
nomar09 (4) - USA - NOV 3, 2006 does not count
4.7 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 20/20
A great beer, that I used to take for granted. With so many great beers in the Portland area (Widmer, McMennamins, Hair of the Dog, etc...) As Iíve gone around the US and tasted their beer, this one is head and shoulders over any other amber Iíve found except Smithwicks.
rparsons157 (4) - USA - MAR 15, 2007 does not count
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Yeasty aroma with a clear gold look. Light taste and good finish. Not a big fan of Ambers but this is one I favor.