Serve in Shaker, Weizen


on tap

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1351   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.89   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
Share this beer with friends!
A golden unfiltered wheat beer that is truly cloudy and clearly superb.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
y0cola (361) - fremont, California, USA - OCT 5, 2003
UPDATED: APR 14, 2004 Bland. I agree with beandip when she says it tastes like a pilsner..lacks in the flavor area.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
Yeastmaster (44) - USA - OCT 4, 2003
I think a lot of the ratings below are a bit harsh on this beer. It has a pleasant aroma and flavor (although admittedly they are weak), similar to Harpoon's UFO but lacking its citrus lemon tartness. However, this is what you'd expect from a hefeweiz. I'd prefer it if it had a better mouthfeel, but, other than that, its an acceptable wheat beer.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 8/20
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - SEP 30, 2003
I think this is a pretty bland, nothing great about it, hefeweizen. It pours with a cloudy pale golden body, as you would expect from a hefe, topped by a medium thick white head with a good amount of lacing. The aroma is pretty much non-existant, although some lemony wheaty notes were observed. the flavor is not memerable at all. It's slightly bitter and hoppy(?) with slight wheat notes and very slight lemon and yeasty notes. It's light bodied, smooth and refreshing to drink, but so are so many other hefeweizens that have some character.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - SEP 27, 2003
not bad at all... another smokey bar, but it managed to chase my guiness well... and that's damn good for a wheat beer. Great color and aroma for a wheat... a wheat that i would have again.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - SEP 23, 2003
It looked beautiful. Nice golden color that practically glowed. But in aroma and taste it was terribly lacking. Just sort of a bland beer. If it was an American Standard I would say better than average. But as an American Wheat ... well, it's not exciting.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
Discofish (152) - USA - SEP 18, 2003
I was somewhat dissapointed by this one. It resembles more an ale than a weis beer. Too much hops, and not enough wheat or fruit. Not a bad taste, but not really what I was expecting for the style.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - SEP 5, 2003
On tap. Pours a hazy gold with nice foamy head. Aroma of wheat and citrus. Pleasant, wheaty flavor, a little hoppy. A pleasing wheat.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - SEP 4, 2003
Had it on tap, poured a cloudy gold with a very nice frothy head. Aroma was quite weak. Flavor was hoppier than any wheat ive ever had. A little spicieness and wheat flavor blended well. Not great, but beter than the average wheat.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
FatherMoss (21) - Moscow, Idaho, USA - SEP 2, 2003
I was impressed by the pour and the duration of the head, but as the glass wore on I just found myself wishing it was done. There's not much about the flavor and aroma that I could say that hasn't been said before, so I'll just come to the point. A decent beer, but ultimately somewhat forgettable.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 14/20
omnivore (270) - San Francisco, California, USA - AUG 26, 2003
This bottle had been sitting around in my sister's pantry for a while (hey, I was desperate). The date on the bottle was October 2000. It's aroma was sweet and yeasty. The color was a nice honey brown. It had a hoppy attack, wheaty body and a bitter leave. It wasn't spectacular, but it wasn't bad, either considering it was kept in less than ideal conditions. There was quite a bit of yeast sediment collected at the bottom... ahhh, the beauty of unfiltered beer!

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 116 117 118  119  120 121 122 » 136

Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
about us
About RateBeer
New Beers
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50