YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - DEC 15, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Disappointing. Hoped for a nice brew with cranberry hints. Not the case. The look was okay with an amber body under a white head. The aroma was almost non-existent. No real cranberry sensation. The flavor was blah. A beer without anything going for it.
hotstuff (3567) - Indiana, USA - NOV 27, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not to my liking at all, but then again, I'm not a fan of fruit beers. This beer poured a small sized white head with fine-small sized bubbles that quickly dissipated. The body was uncarbonated, cloudy with an orange hue. The nose was malty and a slight cranberry aroma. The flavor was acidic with some cranberry flavoring to it with a tingly, watery, thin palate. This beer was light bodied with no lacing.
thedm (4850) - Fort Wayne, USA - NOV 26, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
This brew poured a small head of fine to medium sized mostly diminishing white colored bubbles that left behind a fair laceing and a hazy softly carbonated yeast floaty light orange brown colored body. The aroma was mild with notes of fruit and yeast. The mouthfeel was tingly mildly acidic and a little on the bitter side. The flavor was mostly of mild cranberry and sweet malt. Not as bad as I had anticipated and rather pleasant on top of the other brews I have had this evening.
DrnkMcDermott (2717) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - NOV 17, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: AUG 19, 2004 Bottled. Not too great. Thin head atop a light coppery body with just a touch of pink too it. Base malts are pleasant, but without much character to them. Cranberry flavor is a little slight and leaves a saccharine aftertaste. A stronger hop presence would be interesting. I hope these guys keep working on it.
Re-rate: Guess I was a little under the weather when I tried my first bottle, as the second one comes across much smoother. Cranberry taste is more noticeable this time, but not overpowering, and surprisingly, not cranberry bitter. I shared this at my homebrew club tasting and yes, the wives enjoyed it (but these are beer-drinking wives who also homebrew, not wine cooler wives. They also dig my chile beers).
DavidP (1745) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 11, 2003
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: NOV 25, 2003 Light copper color, thin white head diminishes quickly. Minimal aroma, slightly malty. As for the taste... It tastes like sugar-water with a splash of cranberry juice. It starts with a wishy-washy malt and finishes with some weak hops, but there's not much to this stuff. If I ever get brave enough to open up the next bottle in my six-pack and it's better than this one, I'll re-rate.
JoeM500 (1902) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - APR 9, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Light, hazy gold with a thin clustering head. Nose is malty, like their Oderbolz Bock, with just the slightest cherry/cranberry note. While tart on the sides of my tongue, the "malt-delivery-system" was very watery and bland. They have a long, long way to go if they ever want to hang with the big boys of Wisconsin Fruit Beers!
igneous1 (1475) - Davenport, Iowa, USA - FEB 21, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
color is an orange/red mixture. not much of a head really..pretty thin, white and mostly nonlasting. aroma is very earthy, musty and dusty. surprisingly, i dont pick up any cranberry qualities at all in the aroma. flavor has some cranberry and a very sharp acidic quality to it. i added this beer today as a fruit beer without tasting, but after trying it, possibly might be more of an American Wheat instead???