2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 britishalenerd (11) - USA - DEC 28, 2006Complete crap. I’m a fan of British beers, but this is just crap. Taste like no lager I’ve ever tasted. Strange after taste. When in London avoid at all cost.
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 veronika (410) - SWEDEN - SEP 2, 2004
Golden, small head. Aroma is floral and from toffee. Toffee comes back in the flavor together with some bread. Bitter finish, a good lager.
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 rlgk (7446) - Skövde, SWEDEN - AUG 14, 2004
Yellow/golden, smalle head. Aroma is clearly malty from toffee and butter. Flavor is malty with floral touches. Buttery palate and a somewhat bitter finish. This was a nice surprise to me...
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 fiulijn (12179) - Malmö, DENMARK - DEC 8, 2003
Young's Export Premium Lager, Keg Pale color. Undistinguishable aroma. Light taste, but with an original flowery note (elderflower). Dry.
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20 SilkTork (4898) - Rochester, Kent, United Kingdom, WALES - SEP 8, 2003
On Tap, The Courthouse, Dartford. Slightly fuller bodied than the Pilsner with a more prounced malt presence and a better balance with the hops. Remains good tasting for longer than the Pilsner. Salty finish.
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20 Nuffield (3348) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - JUL 2, 2003
I had this side-by-side with the Young's Pilsner. This had just a wee bit more head than the pilsner, but not enough to discount the possibility of just two different glasses. Perhaps it is a faint shade darker (more orange) as well, but close enough to make no odds. You really wouldn't necessarily pick these two apart by appearance. Grassy, dusty aroma, with a pretty ugly similar flavor. At home this would have been a drain pour, but at the pub it was just the better part of a half-pint left on the table as I left. (on tap, Kings Arms, Oxford)
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20 Frank (2188) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 1, 2003
Sampled on tap in London. Pale, glowing golden. Thin head but tons of lace. Malty nose with a hint of hops. Very flavorful--lightly fruity, prefect hop bitterness in the finish. A damn fine lager.
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20 boto (1661) - Granby, Connecticut, USA - JUN 18, 2003
UPDATED: SEP 8, 2003 Draught: I had this on tap at a pub called the Spread Eagle in London. The beer was a nice golden color. It had a little head, with not much carbonation to it. There was a slight hop aroma to it. There was also a similar mild hoppiness to the taste. This had a good bit more of a malty body than your typical lager. Very smooth. I'm guessing that it is very different in bottles than on tap, based on other reviews of this beer.
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20 ravidesai (938) - Bombay, INDIA - OCT 25, 2002
tsandard lager,bland malt base with a light hop finish.
expected better from Youngs.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20 PieTaster (32) - Humpton, California, USA - SEP 21, 2002
Complete crap. I’m a fan of British beers, but this is just crap. Taste like no lager I’ve ever tasted. Strange after taste. When in London avoid at all cost.
|