Elwood (2900) - Leesburg, Virginia, USA - JUN 17, 2013
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Serving: 12 oz. bottle. It pours an amber color with a Styrofoam like white head. The nose is mild with a hint of malt. A little thin on the palate compared to itís heavier brother. There is a little malt and a slight stale bitterness, but not much else flavor wise. Meh. Oddly enough, if Iím going for a light lager, it probably isnít going to be this.
Onslow (1018) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - MAY 31, 2013
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pour from a 12oz bottle. Remarkably similar to the very good Traditional Lager, except for a lighter finish and lower ABV.
ffaoe (163) - York, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 20, 2013
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
good color with a nice head. decent malty aroma. balanced but light flavor.
Nekronos (3359) - Xalapa, MEXICO - MAY 19, 2013
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Just a regular lager. And light too. NOt much to tell about it. It was just dirnkable but not much more.
eelbasher (189) - New Jersey, USA - APR 16, 2013
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
12oz can, right from the can. Light aroma of grain and some bread. Flavor is very light and carbonated. Easy to drink and not much going on here....decent if nothing else is available. Much better than other mass market hoopla
crossovert (5627) - Illinois, USA - APR 8, 2013
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Grainy smell, its a fucking american light lager, what are you expecting? Gold? No better than a BMC product and donít kid yourself.
artmcd8 (1078) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 23, 2013
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Same yuengling taste with a lighter flavor. I would say it is over carbonated but not too awful. Definitely not as bad as the rating suggests.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
vmilaxer29 (397) - North Dakota, USA - FEB 17, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Nothing amazing. Itís like a yuengling, but without any of the flavor or body. Better than a macro brew, though.
kramer (4347) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 7, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear bright copper body with a small fizzy off-white head. The nose is a bit heavier on the corn than the regular lager and a bit rougher and husky. Surprising, cause I thought it would just be more watery. The flavor is rather watery though, thin and laced with corn, not a whole lot else here. Thin and watery with fizzy carbonation and a short finish. I kinda enjoy the regular lager, but this is pretty bad.
ryanscourt (452) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 28, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nothing bad here, but not nearly as much going on as traditional lager. Much more water. However at 99 calories it has definite appeal and still more flavor than other like choices. Has its place, and i enjoy getting a case with large groups.