MattShizzle (597) - Bernville, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 2, 2006
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not good. This is definitely the worst from Yuengling. Why would a good brewery like this degrade themself by making a light beer? Give me chesterfield ale any day!
waveman352 (178) - Saratoga Springs, New York, USA - DEC 25, 2005
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
12 oz. bottle 12/24/05. A pretty good light beer. Definatly similar to that of the traditional lager. More watered down and nothing to great. Other than apperaling to light beer drinkers its not all that great. For sure one of the best light beers iíve tried obviously behind Samuel Adams Light.
ChazyRPh (583) - Chazy, New York, USA - DEC 21, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
bottle...crystal clear light amber color with fizzy white head that totally disappears in less than a minute. Malty aroma, with a slight DMS presence. Kind of earthy malt aroma. Malty flavors, not a lot of character. Minimal if any hop presence, I actually taste none, certainly not offensive, but unimpressive. Would be a good session beer, not unlike what I expected.
Beerman6686 (6244) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 7, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
aroma is decent much like normal yuengling, appearance is pretty light, flavor is alot like rolling rock but with a better after taste, palate is watery though
Ritterkreuz (179) - Seneca Falls, New York, USA - DEC 1, 2005
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
A good beer, but not the best, if you like light beers its definately worth a try.
zdeuce (3) - USA - NOV 23, 2005 does not count
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Itís definately a light beer. Disappointing as I like Yuengling lager. Watered down version of the regular lager. If you like Yuengling, and are trying to stick to light beers, I guess this might be ok, but otherwise I would say stay away.
clifford0163 (93) - Maryland, USA - NOV 16, 2005
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
taste like the lager but with a water downed flavor i dont understand why thy make this beer its not worth it
jhliesen (818) - West Melbourne, Florida, USA - NOV 15, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle-Poured amber with the tiniest of heads, malt flavor with some corn taste. No real aroma present. Still, it had more flavor than I expected--however, as the beer sat for a few minutes, the taste became less and less pleasant.
nick76 (4372) - Tampa, Florida, USA - NOV 1, 2005
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not much here. The aroma is very weak with only a light sweet malty smell and somewhat stinky. The appearance is copper golden but hurt by the fizzy head that reminds me of soda pop. The flavor is not that great either. Some malt but mostly dominated by corn. Palate is thin. Overall this is not very good.
Fantomas23 (463) - Pewaukee, Wisconsin, USA - OCT 24, 2005
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Copper colored with a standard white lager head. Smelled skunky but drank smooth. Not much flavor here. Just a watered down version of the Traditional.