rudolf (2353) - Buffalo, New York, USA - SEP 18, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light toasty malt nose. Sour with a very lightly toasted malt. A bit of lemon/malt in the finish. Blech.
IMtheOptimator (1164) - Bethel, Connecticut, USA - AUG 18, 2005
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Poured an effervescent amber with a semi-creamy white head. Very faint citrusy aroma... nothing displeasant but barely discernible. Taste is heavy burnt corn... obviously from the extra 2 hours of cooking time used in making this beer. Unpleasant corny finish. Light body.
blank (996) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUL 25, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
slighly more watery version of the original. It still does have favor and none of the cheap beer aftertaste. But still far weaker then the original
DragonStout (1409) - Pickerington, Ohio, USA - JUL 21, 2005
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tastes like the lager but watered down.I am a big fan of yuengling so in my eyes they have yet brew a bad beer.ther r not to many lite beers i will drink but this one is good
redlight (2318) - Orlando, Florida, USA - JUL 17, 2005
2.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Great light beer. Now my light beer of choice! Taste very similar to Yuengling. Redlight Redlight’s got it.
dp (608) - uniontown, Ohio, USA - JUL 2, 2005
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Really enjoyed this, especially for a light. Bought a 12, was surprised how fast it went. Wish they sold this brew in Ohio.
Nejhleader (1411) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 30, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
pretty much just a watered down yuengling lager. not much taste there no aroma or anything. i guess for a light beer its not bad.
IPFreely (1470) - Sanborn, New York, USA - JUN 8, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Ugh. From a can. Very watery, dry, relatively nondeScript flavors. Metallic, overly carbonated. Ugh.
lagermonkey (725) - Marietta, Georgia, USA - MAY 10, 2005
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a pale copper with a thin white head, quickly dissipates and has no lace. Smells lightly grassy.
Taste has a better malt profile than I had expected. Lightly sweet and hints of nuttiness. Light hops finish. However, overall it is too watery and doesn’t have much aftertaste. Very thin. Very drinkable though and as far as light lagers go, this one isn’t offensive.
apost8n8 (123) - USA - APR 2, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Watery not much flavor, the color is more of an amber than the typical wheat colored light beer. It tastes muchlike a fountain drink imitatio nof a beer. Slightly better than a bud or coors light but not much.