tidiaguy (168) - Hawley, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 4, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Typical light beer, but I'm partial to Yuengling so it's already better than most macro lights to me. Very much like the original just light. Refreshing and clean tasteing. I don't drink light beer so I doubt I'll have it again.
Braudog (5965) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - JAN 1, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This is a disappointment. It's crystal clear with a sweet corn-malty character. Yuengling continues to go down hill.
jgb9348 (4979) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - DEC 24, 2003
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light clear copper colour with a very fast dissolving tan head. Aroma of metal, malt and a super light hoppiness. Not bad for a light! Light-bodied (just as expected); Ultra-Carbonated; Thin malt flavour with a bunch of metal and no hops nor sweetness. Overall, a decent light, hardly any taste, but the aroma is nice! I sampled this twelve ounce beer courtesy of Haddon90 on 19-December-2003, Purchased from Total Wine in Manassas, Virginia. Thanks again Phil!
StoutOrDeath (121) - USA - DEC 17, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I love Yeungling beers for one simple reason--the price. It's a macrobrew but it's not from the big boys,so in a way it's a micro-macrobrew. But having said that, light beer sucks. This one is no exception.
fryjohn (12) - Maryland, USA - DEC 15, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: DEC 19, 2003 Smells like beer watered down with water. Light gold/yellow appearance. Too carbonated, watery, lacking in taste, almost undrinkable.
haddon90 (1559) - Costa Mesa, California, USA - NOV 30, 2003
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not too bad for a light beer! Light golden color with a light head. Kind of like the original just a little lighter. Not too bad during a hot summer day.
Holdwine (1111) - Beertimore, Maryland, USA - NOV 12, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
For what it is suppoed to be, it succeeds quite well. At least it tastes a little like beer, unlike the A-B, Miller, Coors lights. Almost half way to a good beer.
mrpeanut (17) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 6, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
God awful. I almost needed a chaser. The aftertaste is horrendous. Stick with the original and do some pushups in the morning instead.
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 25, 2003
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This isn't too bad. A good beer to have a few of, but I would still choose others over it.
tsarman (794) - Northern, New Jersey, USA - OCT 16, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tastes very similar to the normal Lager. Its fine for a college kegger. Better than a normal light.