porterhouse (1581) - Boothbay Harbor, Maine, USA - DEC 31, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(Bottle) Light orange amber with an off-white head, Rotten-eggy aroma. Dry, thin, prickly palate. Flavor of rotten egg and some bread. Corn and light caramel. Wooden and foul.
DrSilverworm (2705) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - DEC 28, 2011
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz bottle. Perfectly clear yellow color, minimal white head. An unpleasant slightly skunky nose-smell. Aroma is very watered down, a hint of white bread under there. Carbonation is sharp, but not actually overwhelming. Light body. There might be some other grains in here, perhaps rye. Taste is hardly there at all, maybe a bit savory, just mostly water. Nothing good nor bad about it. This light lager is what it is... Better than most other light lagers Iíve had
FunkyBrewster (1513) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 25, 2011
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
12oz bottle. Pouts light golden with a small white froth. Aroma light sweet malty with some grain as hay. Flavor much the same, light crisp And sweet not bland though like many pale lagers refreshing but still a nice malt grain flavor. Ligh to light medium body and a crisp carbonation. Nice pale lager
Bcoble003 (206) - Aiea, Hawaii, USA - DEC 21, 2011
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Out of bottle smells of the traditional lager with a light sweetness little taste of almost of a corn not the worst light lager Iíve had.
jcos (1175) - Maryland, USA - DEC 18, 2011
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Location/Date:Bottle on 12/18/2011.
Appearance:Pours a clear orange.
Aroma: Aroma is of light bready malt, similar to Yuengling regular.
Taste: Malty up front, no bitterness, then some kind of sweetness on the end with a sour finish.
Palate:I know this a light lager, but itís a little thin.
Summary: I get why this is made, for less calories than a Yuengling - but Yuengling regular is one of my "lighter" beers, so this isnít neccesary. Drinkable but not really worth it, the aroma is the highlight.
radioseer (296) - Virginia, USA - DEC 4, 2011
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(24 ounce can - tumbler) Amber color and no head. Taste is watered down. It is similar to regular yuengling but with less flavor.
dimenhetfield (2354) - , Florida, USA - DEC 2, 2011
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz bottle. The aroma lead me to believe that I was in for a cider esc type beer but sadly there wasnít much of that going on. Itís just another watery light lager.
Lowe1983 (1297) - Dayton, Ohio, USA - DEC 1, 2011
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours a golden color with a white head. Aroma is of hay and earthy tones. Flavor is the same. Not the best from Yuengling.
twindadplus2 (554) - Wisconsin, USA - NOV 29, 2011
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pretty non-descript beer. Typical pale color with a minimal head, mild grain aroma, crisp cereal grain taste and a minimal finish. Itís a typical light pale lager. Nothing offensive but nothing much to speak of at all really.
dbarnold (1073) - Bethesda, Maryland, USA - NOV 26, 2011
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
for a beer with 99 calories its really pretty good, but then again no actually good beer has that little juice is actually good. Has a clean crisp finish, which is probably the most distinguishing characteristic. Nothing bad in the palate, but not much else, either.