jredmond (5463) - Manhattan, New York, USA - DEC 9, 2006
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: FEB 26, 2009 Had from a variety case..This light lager is nothing special. However, Id much rather down a few nattys instead of this though - to save money.
TheBeerGod (5287) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - MAY 31, 2008
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Soft gold pour. Small white head. Nose is grainy and malty with some cereal and some grassy or straw notes. Taste is malty and grainy. Light cereal, soft metallic notes and hints of grass and lemon. Body is light with lots of carbonation. Ends with more grains, soft bitterness, grassy hops, and light lemon. Soft cereal notes here too. Not too bad for a light beer.
Suttree (5190) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JUL 8, 2007
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Oh dear, why do i do this to myself? Like other It was exactly what I expected, nothing more, nothing less.
heemer77 (5104) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - DEC 15, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
No head after the pour. Light corn and sweet honey aroma. Not much else. The taste is as expected. Nothing offensive. Minimal hops and some thin grass tasting malts. A decent brew that beats lots of BMC offerings. . Thanks civforprez for donating this beer.
kramer (5034) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 7, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear bright copper body with a small fizzy off-white head. The nose is a bit heavier on the corn than the regular lager and a bit rougher and husky. Surprising, cause I thought it would just be more watery. The flavor is rather watery though, thin and laced with corn, not a whole lot else here. Thin and watery with fizzy carbonation and a short finish. I kinda enjoy the regular lager, but this is pretty bad.
Strykzone (5009) - Wood River, Illinois, USA - JUL 1, 2009
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This might have been the best light beer I have had. It had a bit of caramel color with a nice thick whitish head that had nice retention and added a creamy feel to the beer. Flavor was definitely "light beer-ish." Not a lot going on but still more and better than many pale lagers that are not "light."
FROTHINGSLOSH (4973) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 12, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I had some hope for this one but alas it severely disappointed. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a dark amber color with a large white head. The aroma was sour and tangy malts - almost skunky. The flavor was sour, tangy, corny and a bit skunky. There was a long off aftertaste.
jgb9348 (4778) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - DEC 24, 2003
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light clear copper colour with a very fast dissolving tan head. Aroma of metal, malt and a super light hoppiness. Not bad for a light! Light-bodied (just as expected); Ultra-Carbonated; Thin malt flavour with a bunch of metal and no hops nor sweetness. Overall, a decent light, hardly any taste, but the aroma is nice! I sampled this twelve ounce beer courtesy of Haddon90 on 19-December-2003, Purchased from Total Wine in Manassas, Virginia. Thanks again Phil!
Boutip (4775) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - APR 21, 2014
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle: Poured a clear golden color lager with small bubbly white head with minimal retention. Aroma of sweet notes with light cereal notes. Taste is also dominated by sweet cereal notes with almost no aftertaste. Body is light with good carbonation. Easy drinking lager with very little complexity.
radagast83 (4753) - Fairfax, Virginia, USA - JUN 9, 2006
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Better light beer than most of the other beers out there. Nothing special to note about it. Would rather drink Yuengling regular instead.