radagast83 (5820) - Fairfax, Virginia, USA - JUN 9, 2006
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Better light beer than most of the other beers out there. Nothing special to note about it. Would rather drink Yuengling regular instead.
Strykzone (5627) - Wood River, Illinois, USA - JUL 1, 2009
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This might have been the best light beer I have had. It had a bit of caramel color with a nice thick whitish head that had nice retention and added a creamy feel to the beer. Flavor was definitely "light beer-ish." Not a lot going on but still more and better than many pale lagers that are not "light."
FROTHINGSLOSH (5602) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 12, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I had some hope for this one but alas it severely disappointed. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a dark amber color with a large white head. The aroma was sour and tangy malts - almost skunky. The flavor was sour, tangy, corny and a bit skunky. There was a long off aftertaste.
TheBeerGod (5598) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - MAY 31, 2008
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Soft gold pour. Small white head. Nose is grainy and malty with some cereal and some grassy or straw notes. Taste is malty and grainy. Light cereal, soft metallic notes and hints of grass and lemon. Body is light with lots of carbonation. Ends with more grains, soft bitterness, grassy hops, and light lemon. Soft cereal notes here too. Not too bad for a light beer.
Suttree (5594) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JUL 8, 2007
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Oh dear, why do i do this to myself? Like other It was exactly what I expected, nothing more, nothing less.
Rciesla (5499) - Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA - DEC 28, 2010
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Pours a pale golden body with a light white head. Very little aromatic or flavor, grain, hay, a hint of fruit sweetness. Very thin lightly sweet and simple about what you probably expect.
Beerman6686 (5405) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 7, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
aroma is decent much like normal yuengling, appearance is pretty light, flavor is alot like rolling rock but with a better after taste, palate is watery though
kramer (5395) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 7, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear bright copper body with a small fizzy off-white head. The nose is a bit heavier on the corn than the regular lager and a bit rougher and husky. Surprising, cause I thought it would just be more watery. The flavor is rather watery though, thin and laced with corn, not a whole lot else here. Thin and watery with fizzy carbonation and a short finish. I kinda enjoy the regular lager, but this is pretty bad.
Boutip (5233) - Gatineau, Quebec, CANADA - APR 21, 2014
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle: Poured a clear golden color lager with small bubbly white head with minimal retention. Aroma of sweet notes with light cereal notes. Taste is also dominated by sweet cereal notes with almost no aftertaste. Body is light with good carbonation. Easy drinking lager with very little complexity.
heemer77 (5187) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - DEC 15, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
No head after the pour. Light corn and sweet honey aroma. Not much else. The taste is as expected. Nothing offensive. Minimal hops and some thin grass tasting malts. A decent brew that beats lots of BMC offerings. . Thanks civforprez for donating this beer.