RateBeer
overall
4
45
style

bottled
common

on tap
available

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 424   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.06   EST. CALORIES: 114   ABV: 3.8%
No commercial description


1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
MAP (1133) - Lakewood, Ohio, USA - JUL 6, 2003
Too watery, but I wasnt expecting much else. Little malt flavor and nothing else.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
SJP (483) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 20, 2003
This tastes exactly like Chinese beer. Watery, bland, and unexciting. Yuck.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
tsarman (794) - Northern, New Jersey, USA - OCT 16, 2003
Tastes very similar to the normal Lager. Its fine for a college kegger. Better than a normal light.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
apost8n8 (123) - USA - APR 2, 2005
Watery not much flavor, the color is more of an amber than the typical wheat colored light beer. It tastes muchlike a fountain drink imitatio nof a beer. Slightly better than a bud or coors light but not much.

1.3
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
stoutchap (421) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAY 8, 2006
The only thing I can say about this beer is that it did not taste or smell offensive and that is why I rated it so "highly." It was kind of like colored water with a little yeasty smell and flavor added to it. Never again.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
hombrepalo (1956) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - AUG 25, 2011
12oz bottle, from a mix a sixer pack I picked up in Ten. . Golden pour with a thin white head. Grassy and malty aroma with some hops. Could not and would not finish this beer.

1.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
magsinva (1005) - Virginia, USA - SEP 2, 2012
Bottle from DiarmaidBHK - why did they bother with this? They could have watered down normal lager and had a better result.

1.2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
mrpeanut (17) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 6, 2003
God awful. I almost needed a chaser. The aftertaste is horrendous. Stick with the original and do some pushups in the morning instead.

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
zdeuce (3) - USA - NOV 23, 2005 does not count
It’s definately a light beer. Disappointing as I like Yuengling lager. Watered down version of the regular lager. If you like Yuengling, and are trying to stick to light beers, I guess this might be ok, but otherwise I would say stay away.

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
mynameisjonas (206) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 20, 2007
not a very good light beer for such a historical brewery. definatly not their best


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 35 36 37  38  39 40 41 » 43


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50