hombrepalo (1913) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - AUG 25, 2011
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
12oz bottle, from a mix a sixer pack I picked up in Ten. . Golden pour with a thin white head. Grassy and malty aroma with some hops. Could not and would not finish this beer.
magsinva (931) - Virginia, USA - SEP 2, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle from DiarmaidBHK - why did they bother with this? They could have watered down normal lager and had a better result.
mrpeanut (17) - Latrobe, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 6, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
God awful. I almost needed a chaser. The aftertaste is horrendous. Stick with the original and do some pushups in the morning instead.
zdeuce (3) - USA - NOV 23, 2005 does not count
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Itís definately a light beer. Disappointing as I like Yuengling lager. Watered down version of the regular lager. If you like Yuengling, and are trying to stick to light beers, I guess this might be ok, but otherwise I would say stay away.
mynameisjonas (206) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 20, 2007
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
not a very good light beer for such a historical brewery. definatly not their best
Prcaus (159) - New Jersey, USA - MAY 16, 2007
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle-Yellowish coloring, with a watery, thin taste, overall disappointing, definitely recommend stinking with regular Yuenling, but again there was a time and a place
freekyp (1561) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - SEP 3, 2007
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Very similar in flavor to the regular Yuengling lager just...ahem...lighter. Watery mouthfeel and overcarbonated. Light corny flavor with some residual sweetness. Deep amber with a slight white head that fades quickly. Aroma? Yeah, I didnít notice any at all. Not really offensive. I guess that is a plus.
FROTHINGSLOSH (5215) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 12, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I had some hope for this one but alas it severely disappointed. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a dark amber color with a large white head. The aroma was sour and tangy malts - almost skunky. The flavor was sour, tangy, corny and a bit skunky. There was a long off aftertaste.
gsteph (321) - knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JUL 25, 2010
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pours a clarified copper with a bright white, semi-frothy head. It looks pretty good. That is undeniably where the positives stop. Nose has nuances of malt, corn and rice with some herbal grassiness. Flavor are typical of a what I would expect of a light.....toasted paper bag. There is no depth of flavor unless you like corrugated cardboard. Finishes with a touch of corn sweetness and funk. You canít really bash it though.....it is what it set out to be.
ghawener (1518) - San Salvador, EL SALVADOR - SEP 26, 2011
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle: Actually has some malty taste, I still donít understand if light beers are light because of calories or low alcohol. Food Pairing: Anything will do.