RateBeer
overall
39
14
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 964   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.95   EST. CALORIES: 156   ABV: 5.2%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A dark brew, smooth and mellow, with a slight caramel flavor.


2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 9/20
Braudog (5758) - Glenville, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 15, 2002
Tampa brewery: Roasty nose. Only a hint of light coffee, cutting carbonation. Beginners stout.

2.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Rib Eye (147) - USA - NOV 13, 2002
Bland and boring, this lacks any sort of distinctive character other than a faint suggestion of coffee.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
NJBeerman013 (1050) - Hamilton Twp., New Jersey, USA - NOV 9, 2002
Dark, rich, smooth. Chocholate and caramel in flavor. Good beer.

3.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
snowman (9) - Powhatan, Virginia, USA - NOV 8, 2002 does not count
I recently discovered this beer in a local supermarket for $4.49/six bottles. It was quiet a surprise for the money. Very smooth and goes down good. I am very impressed and will buy again, especially considering it’s price.

3.1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 15/20
slimjim (106) - New Jersey, USA - NOV 7, 2002
Not bad, dark in color. Nice brown head. Carmel flavor. A bit bitter.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
jayme9874 (756) - Hamburg, New York, USA - NOV 6, 2002
Deep red/brown. Little head and lace if any. Decent nose of malted barley, slight hints of coffee and chocolate. As with the porter, it seems stale or maybe thats how its supposed to taste. Slight roast, burning paper, slight sweetness. Piss poor beer.

2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
CaptainCougar (7132) - Columbia, Maryland, USA - OCT 27, 2002
Dark, but not opaque, with a thin tan head. Slighty bitter with a roasted aroma. It has characteristics of a macrobrew in its flavor profile. Kinda thin for a porter and it has a rather dull finish. Not a bad beer, but nothing I would seek out to purchase again.

3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 13/20
GeekedOut (22) - Norfolk, Virginia, USA - OCT 27, 2002
Enjoyable for the price. Would buy again.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
gsmitty80 (1803) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 26, 2002
Not bad but not great. A mix between traditional and porter. Personally i like either of those better but its always good for a switch.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - OCT 23, 2002
Stale odor-stale taste. Head is foamless and flat. Thin taste, no malt flavor, no hops to mention either. What are people who say that this is better than Saranac thinking? This beer tastes like a Buttwiper (budweiser) that has been injected with coloration and artificial flavors. In fact, I would rather drink a buttwiper than this beer. What a crappy beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 85 86 87  88  89 90 91 » 97


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50