DirtyD79 (41) - Pennsylvania, USA - APR 12, 2012
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Not a bad beer. It has a floral aroma with decent flavor. A good beer for lounging around and watching a game.
Fech (270) - Parsippany, New Jersey, USA - APR 10, 2012
2.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
Nothing special with this one. Only thing it has goin for it is the lack of metallic taste that most premium brews have. Solid session brew.
Aurelius (3728) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 8, 2012
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Fresh, somewhat floral armoa. Can looks as though its best served in a dark dive bar. Tangy, starchy and perhaps corny tasting. Lightly sweet, straw malt flavors, a little wort/malt/molasses at the end. Not very bitter. Flabby mouthfeel - it has mass, but not much structure. Loses carbonation. Circle K.
JCB (3999) - Durham, North Carolina, USA - FEB 27, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Tourney sideline tick - thanks, Rim! Itís actually a bit difficult to tell what, beyond the label, is different from regular old Yuengling. Of course, it is a bit more BMC-ish so this screams over-compensation. Did the trick though.
uvajed (171) - Ravenna, Ohio, USA - FEB 7, 2012
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
The name must be Yuenglingís idea of a joke, as there is nothing premium about this. On par with Busch or High Life, though one of the better junk beers, if that means anything. Itís beer, itís cheap, you can drink a lot of it and get drunk, if you want to. What do you want? It is cheap/average American macro swill, no hops to speak of, with plenty of fizz and some metal and corn. Yuengling makes some good beers. This is not one of them. Not the worst youíll find, but I wonít buy it again.
Beerathon (794) - Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 27, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JUL 17, 2012 Nothing special, but itís decent enough for session beer. Pounding a 12 pack of these on a Saturday is easy enough.
johnbuck100 (210) - Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 10, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Bottle at party with no alternatives. I think Yuengling lager is over-rated but this "Premium" beer was worse. Distinct sweet corn taste with no hop presence whatsoever. I could not finish the bottle.
hippyace69 (2) - upper darby, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 29, 2011 does not count
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
This is a great beer for long drinking sessions. Much less filling than the lager and the taste has much less edge, so it goes down faster too. On occasion Iíll grab a case of this if Iím going to a party.
Tmoney99 (9640) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - NOV 21, 2011
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Poured clear light golden color with a medium frothy white head that was mostly lasting with good lacing. Moderate balanced sweet aroma. Medium body with a smooth texture and soft carbonation. Medium sweet flavor with a medium sweet finish of moderate duration. My expectations where met with an average beer.
MarkSachon (435) - Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 1, 2011
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Donít know why itís called "premium" unless they mean you save a premium cause itís always less expensive than Yuengling Traditional Lager. You can taste the difference, mostly through the lack of substance and ingredients.