puzzl (3259) - New York, New York, USA - JAN 21, 2006
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Corny, bready, yucky, thin, pale, fizzy, unpleasant, hardly drinkable, hardly worth it.
beerbill (3605) - Laurel, New York, USA - JAN 13, 2006
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
12 oz. can. Of all the beers I’ve had from Yuengling, this is my least favorite. If you want to drink a light beer from Yuengling, go with the Light Lager. This stuff just isn’t very good.
MacDaddyOJake (274) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - DEC 27, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Very sorry attempt to make a light lager, I did not enjoy this one bit. Odd color, and not much taste at all. No real body, a very thin palate and texture. If you want to drink light beer, then try something else.
WISEGUY572 (1377) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 6, 2005
1.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
The beer that wasn’t there, from the brewery that specializes in beer without interest. Floral hops, no malt, no bitterness. No head, weird color like a raspberry ice tea. Dead flat in the mouth. No charm. Stick with ginger ale or mineral water.
clifford0163 (93) - Maryland, USA - NOV 16, 2005
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
has a light taste to it but over allthere is nothing to wite home about has a nice flavor for a light beer
Tmoney99 (13344) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - OCT 27, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Poured a dark amber color with an average creamy white head that was mostly lasting. Light hoppy aroma. Light to medium body with a thin texture. Light flavor with short finish. A premium but light beer.
DarkElf (3051) - La Jolla, California, USA - OCT 2, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
(12 oz bottle: Obtained in trade with hopdog, thanks Steve!) Typical light beer, with a woody, cardboard flavor and nose, and minimal sweetness, but there is a slight hop bitterness, but ever so slight, and only because the malt is so weak. Also typical is the quickly diminishing flavor as it drops off a cliff, leading to a very quick and flavorless finish. Light bodied, pretty watery. Medium straw body is crystal clear. The small, white head fades to a patchy film. Why would anyone drink this? Filtered water has no calories and tastes better.
Ron (3554) - Rochester, New York, USA - AUG 23, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
One bottle from BOTW. Seemed like the usual watered down Lager so that it could be called light. Had that distinctively unplesent light beer aftertaste that I can not yet describe.
IMtheOptimator (1164) - Bethel, Connecticut, USA - AUG 18, 2005
2.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Poured an effervescent yellow with a semi-creamy white head. Citrusy hop aroma... surprisingly good for the style. Taste is mostly that of burnt corn with a distasteful finish. Seems to be missing a lot of the citrus tones and refreshing nature of the regular Premium beer.
Nejhleader (1444) - Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 6, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
wasn’t as bad as i thought it would be. pretty smooth wasn’t too thin or watery. didn’t have the same taste as most macro light beers. Basically tasted like a really week pale lager.