hezron (614) - Viroqua, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 31, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Good light beer, drank cold from my pilsner glass and enjoyed outside with pizza. Light citrus aroma and flavor.
stegosaurus (1882) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 24, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
not bad for a light beer, im not to much of a fan for light beer, but its drinkable, and for a light beer still tastes like beer.
MolsonMan (58) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 26, 2005
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Had this beer ice cokl straight from the bottle. Very unimpressed. Could have mistaken this beer for ice wat. No aroma and bland.
dirtyc (173) - Erie, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 20, 2005
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
I don’t know why it took me this long to have Yuengling Light, but I finally did and it has great taste for being light, I will always love Yuengling, best out of a bottle
jgb9348 (5529) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - JAN 1, 2005
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Crystal clear blonde golden coloured body with a nice white head that seems to last for a bit. Good for a light beer, but still doesn’t match with the Sam Adams light appearance. Aroma of pale malt, very low amounts of hops, some cardboard and an actually very nice smelling orange/citrus twang. Super-light-bodied; Tastes similar to water, with no horrible metal, malt, stale hops or any other off-flavours. Aftertaste shows a very light amount of malt, and some of the citrus sugars, but nothing else. Very non-offensive and mild. A good light beer-especially for what people want, a mild and alcoholic water. I sampled this twelve ounce bottle given to me by my brother-in-law who pulled this one from a 12 pack sampler on 01-January-2005.
savitska (163) - Smyrna, Georgia, USA - AUG 31, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Nothing much to report here. Just your standard light beer, this one coming from "America’s Oldest Brewery".
Jine (903) - Nutley, New Jersey, USA - AUG 28, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
I’ve never had Yuengling Premium Beer, only the Lager. So I can’t talk about the Premium Light compared to the Premium, although I am really disappointed in Yuengling on this one.
beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - AUG 28, 2004
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Light and yeasty, not crazy about this beer. Digestible, that’s about all that can be said for it. Flavor that’s not off-balance, but not particularly friendly either.
oldmonk420 (26) - New York, USA - JUN 30, 2004
3.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Luv the Yuengling family!! They make some good ass beers in general. Pretty good taste for a light beer. Almost up there with my Coors light. Nice pleasant malkt and hops flavor to it. Good head, nice and creamy. Good smooth satisfying finish. Clean and crisp. If I wanted a different light beer this would be it. Old Monk gives it two thumbs up!!
DerBiermeister (586) - Birmingham, Alabama, USA - MAY 6, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I find it wet-towel-smackingly ironic that ’premium’ so often translate’s to the layman’s terms as ’inferior’. This case is in my opinion no exception. What I mean is that Yuengling Light is a better tasting, better palated beer than Yuengling Light Premium; what’s up with that?