jcwattsrugger (11079) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - JUL 24, 2007
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
12 oz bottle-pours a dissipating white head and yellow color. Aroma is macro light lager, grain-some sweet (corn?). taste is Grain-some sweet, faint light hops, which come in the finish as flat. A bit of crispness/musty and a bit thin/huskiness. OK/mild carbonation.
bbp182 (255) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 26, 2007
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This has less flavor then miller lite. How is that possible? No real smell or taste. Just blah.
PhillyBeer2112 (2523) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - MAY 21, 2007
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle, as Yuengling Light. Not too bad for a light lager. Yellow gold color, a thin but tight and creamy head. Aroma is mostly bready (distinctly rye), with a touch of musty hop. Fizzy palate, again very bready, with an empty finish. Light palate, flavorful but still boring.
obxdude10 (2040) - Limerick, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 23, 2007
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just like the regular Premium beer from Yuengling this certainly doesn’t deserve the label, straw in color, corn & rice in the nose, very little head on the beer, what was there disappeared rather quickly, hardly any lacing left around the glass, skunky flavors, watery, way too light in body, drank like carbonated water, fizzy mouthfeel, bland finish, corn in the aftertaste, not a good beer at all
whaleman (2178) - North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 18, 2007
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear pale straw body with a sudsy white head. Aroma of raw corn, grain, a pale nutty Yuengling signature, and some apparent acetaldehyde. Mostly dry and banal with some funky lager yeast properties. Thin, watery texture. Bleh.
jonwayne4883 (401) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 18, 2007
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
premium? nope. light? maybe? good? definitely not. blech. waste of time. watery watery watery.
Sancho (245) - Da Bronx, New York, USA - FEB 14, 2007
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz can, goldoen color no head . a cit of a corny grainy taste light bodied,DUH.overall a good light beer it just so happens that light beers suck
blinesam (235) - USA - JAN 11, 2007
0.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I could probably give this beer a lower rating but im being generous to not piss of my friends at Delaware since they love yuengling. This beer tastes bitter, spoiled, tart and all those other words that tell you it sucks. The smell is actually not horrible which is misleading. The 98 calories is most likely the only reason to drink it...or if its free.
mansquito (3351) - Nueva York, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2006
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
It tastes like the lager, but with less flavour and less alcohol. Unless you like the fact that this has low calories, there is no reason to choose this above the far superior lager.
MadIndian (2366) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 30, 2006
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
They took a watery crap beer and made it worse and called it yuengling light.