jonwayne4883 (401) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 18, 2007
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
premium? nope. light? maybe? good? definitely not. blech. waste of time. watery watery watery.
Sancho (245) - Da Bronx, New York, USA - FEB 14, 2007
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz can, goldoen color no head . a cit of a corny grainy taste light bodied,DUH.overall a good light beer it just so happens that light beers suck
blinesam (235) - USA - JAN 11, 2007
0.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I could probably give this beer a lower rating but im being generous to not piss of my friends at Delaware since they love yuengling. This beer tastes bitter, spoiled, tart and all those other words that tell you it sucks. The smell is actually not horrible which is misleading. The 98 calories is most likely the only reason to drink it...or if its free.
mansquito (3549) - Nueva York, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2006
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
It tastes like the lager, but with less flavour and less alcohol. Unless you like the fact that this has low calories, there is no reason to choose this above the far superior lager.
MadIndian (2433) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 30, 2006
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
They took a watery crap beer and made it worse and called it yuengling light.
hopscotch (9489) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - JUL 21, 2006
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle at the Hagerstown Suns Beer Tasting... Not much to it, really. I guess I’ll just refer to my notes regarding Yeungling’s Premium Beer. Although this one is even more like having sex in a canoe than the non-Light version.
themadmumis (347) - Westminster, Maryland, USA - JUL 20, 2006
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Yeah, nothing great going on here. Clearly a watered down beer. Slightly above the macros, but not by much at all. Lager bring a lot more to the table and is much more enjoyable than this; in bottle, can, or on tap. Light beer is barely better than Coors and Bud Light and is easily distinguishable as water when intoxicated.
Birdiebeagle (958) - Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 8, 2006
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle Pours a clear yellow gold with a fizzy white head. The head deminshes quickly and laces okay. Aroma is a little skunky with mostly grain. Has a good carbination and adecent flavor. Its a picnic beer for the yuppies, but its not awful.
yingman (5) - Auburn, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 7, 2006 does not count
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Its a good light beer.Better than most.Pours a nice golden color with a nise hop flavor
FridgRaider (108) - Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 7, 2006
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
For a light beer its not bad. pours light gold. nice lite hoppy flavor, with an aroma of hops and little malt.