PhillyBeer2112 (2580) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - MAY 21, 2007
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle, as Yuengling Light. Not too bad for a light lager. Yellow gold color, a thin but tight and creamy head. Aroma is mostly bready (distinctly rye), with a touch of musty hop. Fizzy palate, again very bready, with an empty finish. Light palate, flavorful but still boring.
obxdude10 (2093) - Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 23, 2007
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just like the regular Premium beer from Yuengling this certainly doesn’t deserve the label, straw in color, corn & rice in the nose, very little head on the beer, what was there disappeared rather quickly, hardly any lacing left around the glass, skunky flavors, watery, way too light in body, drank like carbonated water, fizzy mouthfeel, bland finish, corn in the aftertaste, not a good beer at all
whaleman (2178) - North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 18, 2007
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear pale straw body with a sudsy white head. Aroma of raw corn, grain, a pale nutty Yuengling signature, and some apparent acetaldehyde. Mostly dry and banal with some funky lager yeast properties. Thin, watery texture. Bleh.
jonwayne4883 (401) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 18, 2007
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
premium? nope. light? maybe? good? definitely not. blech. waste of time. watery watery watery.
Sancho (245) - Da Bronx, New York, USA - FEB 14, 2007
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 9/20
12oz can, goldoen color no head . a cit of a corny grainy taste light bodied,DUH.overall a good light beer it just so happens that light beers suck
blinesam (235) - USA - JAN 11, 2007
0.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I could probably give this beer a lower rating but im being generous to not piss of my friends at Delaware since they love yuengling. This beer tastes bitter, spoiled, tart and all those other words that tell you it sucks. The smell is actually not horrible which is misleading. The 98 calories is most likely the only reason to drink it...or if its free.
mansquito (3758) - Nueva York, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2006
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
It tastes like the lager, but with less flavour and less alcohol. Unless you like the fact that this has low calories, there is no reason to choose this above the far superior lager.
MadIndian (2499) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 30, 2006
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
They took a watery crap beer and made it worse and called it yuengling light.
hopscotch (9826) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - JUL 21, 2006
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle at the Hagerstown Suns Beer Tasting... Not much to it, really. I guess I’ll just refer to my notes regarding Yeungling’s Premium Beer. Although this one is even more like having sex in a canoe than the non-Light version.
themadmumis (347) - Westminster, Maryland, USA - JUL 20, 2006
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Yeah, nothing great going on here. Clearly a watered down beer. Slightly above the macros, but not by much at all. Lager bring a lot more to the table and is much more enjoyable than this; in bottle, can, or on tap. Light beer is barely better than Coors and Bud Light and is easily distinguishable as water when intoxicated.