gsmitty80 (1675) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 26, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Great price in PA. Very light for a lager which makes it go down better than most. My second favorite of the yeungling brews next to porter. Worth a try for the money. Personally i like it a little better in bottles than on tap.
Tom Servo (424) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - OCT 26, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not bad, but not great either. The price is right though. Way too carbonated, with a big honkin’ head. Nothing too great in the flavor department, but not bad. Middle of the pack lager.
JerseysBeast (19) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 24, 2002
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Easy drinkin and tasty. Its suprisingly light for a Lager, so I can drink more of it. Hmm, perhaps I should try its new Light brother.
Allseeingeye (223) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - OCT 22, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Golden amber color. Thin spindly head. Malt, where’s the malt? If I were slumming this is what I would drink.
Scooter110199 (5) - York, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 17, 2002 does not count
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Great for the price. Takes the edge off the day better than more beers.
FORTY DOGG (22) - Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 11, 2002
4.9 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
UPDATED: FEB 9, 2003 This is truly good beer, as a matter of fact, its one of the only normal beers I'll drink, I didn't know beer could actually taste good. Since it would be just plain fuckin wierd to sit down and kill a 40 of St. Ides, say at Red Lobster, or Olive Garden, like when I'm with my Bitch for instance, this would be my choice. I mean come on, I have a little class! Note; I Once bought Yuengling Premium Beer by mistake (they look similar), I will never confuse the two again!
boto (1759) - Granby, Connecticut, USA - OCT 11, 2002
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: FEB 8, 2007 An excellent beer. A fine example of
a lager beer. Doesn’t taste like the other
commercial lagers for sale (ie doesn’t taste)
the same as the rest). It’s great that
this little brewer that has been here
forever (literally) is finally getting
Trappist (284) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - OCT 10, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
I do not care for gold or amber beers, because I usually drink stouts and porters, bitters and ales. However this is a beer that I really like! It has a wonderful taste to it and I will drink it again!
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 4, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
golden amber color with a medium head. the aroma is slightly sour and woody with some sweet notes underneath. the flavor is bitter, yet slightly sweet and malty with a good balnce of hops. tastes very similar to the mass produced beers we all love so much (HaHa)
urbnhautebourg (997) - Annapolis, Maryland, USA - OCT 4, 2002
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Dad always has this on hand when I see him in Pennsylvania. Wish he would pick a different Pa. brewery. In any event, some good maltiness, but there are hints of corn syrup in there that reveal its down-home vulgarity. However, its tough to hate this brewer.