Andrew196 (1277) - Katy, Texas, USA - AUG 10, 2003
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: AUG 13, 2003 (bottle, via mabdoney)Dont know how I had gone this long without having this beer. The color of the beer in a green bottle struck me as odd looking for some reason....Ive seen darker beers in green bottles and also some piss yellow ones, but this apple juice colored beer looked kinda cool with the green in front of it. Anyways, the green bottle bitch slapped this beer into skunk land. A respectable lager--much better than a heieneken, probably be a damn good beer on draught.
SirBeer1963 (14) - Tampa, Florida, USA - AUG 10, 2003
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
yuengling bought out the tampa Pabst plant and I did not think much till I tryed the beer and I was very suprised as it was not at all bad as a mild beer with a full body taste and a light but noticable hops
thedm (5355) - Fort Wayne, USA - AUG 6, 2003
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This brew poured a small head of fine to mediumly sized off-white bubbles and a deep amber brown colored softly carbonated body. It had a very mild malt-hop flavor that was somewhat thin with a very mild malt or no discernable aroma.
YnotABeer (96) - Missouri, USA - AUG 4, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
was impressed with it on tap. went great with food. significantly better than most macrobrews and at the same price (although it's fairly difficult to find). seemed almost like an ale. smooth and well balanced; good amount of hops and just tastes nice and goes down happily.
DirtyD79 (41) - Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 3, 2003
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Damn good beer. Has a nice taste and aftertaste isn't too bad. Definately one of the better beers on the market.
RaginCajun (320) - Houston, Texas, USA - AUG 3, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Okay stuff, only moderately better than macroswill. Very metallic (from the can?) and light; not much taste. Gets a little sweet after 3 or 4 12oz. though, but without that nasty macro aftertaste.
drinkbeer (283) - Redondo Beach, California, USA - JUL 27, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
I went to school in PA and this stuff was on tap everywhere. This was definitely my go-to beer. Screw Miller light and budweiser. Yeungling has a nice malt flavor and is CLEAN. Also looks a lot nicer than those other macro swills. I now live on the west coast and miss not having this on tap at every single bar I go to.
egajdzis (5860) - Pennsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 26, 2003
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: SEP 21, 2003 Amber color with decent white head (larger than I was expecting). Malty, diactyl flavor, actually has more flavor than other beers at this price. Going to school in Philly, we lived off this stuff, now its a treat when a friend's got it for free.
maltdog (621) - Colorado, USA - JUL 24, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours with a nice head, but collapses quickly. Nice copper-amber color. Lightly malty, metallic, surprisingly fruity aroma for a lager. Inoffensive hop bitterness. Fairly light-bodied. Not great, but far ahead of any megaswill. I would have preferred a little more hops all around.
By the way, an excellent counterpart to hothot buffalo wings.
noheinie4u (37) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUL 24, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I agree with happy4hops...good cheap beer...good for parties or when you want to enjoy a lot...