RAUCHFEST (122) - PROSPECT PARK, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 19, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
not a bad run of the brewery beer this beer gets a bad rap alot because people dont clean there tap lines often enough. however it is a nice drinkable every day beer well balanced a little sweet but drinkable and goes well with a nicks roastbeef and lots of horseradish
crvkorn (15) - dillon, South Carolina, USA - JUL 19, 2002
3.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: DEC 29, 2003
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - JUL 18, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
A slightly above average American lager.
coopec (20) - Portland, Connecticut, USA - JUL 18, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
If had to buy Lawn Mower beer this would be the one. Nothing special but itís cold.
SETANTA (582) - Bangor, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 18, 2002
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
About as low as Iíll go in beer, corn flavor stands out in malt profile
homebrewrules99 (37) - portsmouth, Virginia, USA - JUL 18, 2002
4.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
not to bad could be better but alrght just the same
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUL 16, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
RE-rate: had way too much of this at the beach. Iíve noticed that it gets too sweet after a couple.
Fantastic. donít know why i can never find it in Ohio. A summertime favorite.
jpm8920 (152) - Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA - JUL 12, 2002
4.7 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
very good lager, thick and rich
ClarkVV (3892) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 10, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: AUG 1, 2006 My favorite lager on tap! need i say more? yes. It has a wonderful crisp hoppy start, and leaves a pungent hoppy trail all through your mouth as it washes down and leaves traces of malt notes behind. Delicate yet strongly stated. wow.
Well I suppose Iím due for a rerate of this one. Iíve certainly had many many bottles of it since my first draught experience. It certainly is no 4.1 in bottles, being pasteurized and filtered and having a distinct, yeasty, green-apple and paper flavor/aroma, with some plastic.
I donít know, I strongly hold that the fresh draughts Iíve had at PIttsburgh airport were easily 4.1ís, but until I can get back and verify that with myself (having been a LONG time ago relative to my palate development), I suppose I should average the draught score with the bottled score.
Overall is an average of the two.
Aggie80 (785) - Michigan, USA - JUL 9, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Intorduced to this by my cousin on tap. Interesting stuff, better than I expected.