af310310 (14) - - AUG 5, 2012
3.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
Of the American macrobrews, Yuengling gets a clear edge in my book. Actually a decently flavorful beer and a very pleasing amber color for a rock bottom price to compete with the likes of Budweiser. This blows Budweiser out of the water over and over again. Itís often either this or Molson Canadian when Iím looking for a cheap sessionable beer, depends on what Iím in the mood for. For a $10 12 pack, itís hard to beat Yuengling Traditional Lager.
PendulousFall (14) - - MAR 29, 2014
4.6 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
The bottle scared me a bit. Itís green...usually green bottled beers are not my thing. When it was poured for me it had a beautiful color and aroma that was very subtle. This brew does not bite. It is smooth on the palate with little aftertaste. Great out of the bottle or from the tap. Tonight, it was my go-to after a terrible night of taste-testing.
kpachla02 (14) - Shelby Township, Alabama, USA - AUG 8, 2014
2.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Average beer. Good for someone who lives in Michigan and isnít accessible often. Nice cheap beer.
micahb (14) - - NOV 29, 2014
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Never had a Bud, but assume this is a standard, mass produced American beer. I thought it was disgusting and had bad egg-like smell and taste.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Z28Jersey99 (13) - New Jersey, USA - MAR 26, 2002
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Good overall beer, goes down good and tastes good, cant ask for much more
dBrEiEnRk (13) - Quakertown, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 14, 2003
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
best of the bargain lagers. goes down easy.
MackJigger (13) - Maryland, USA - FEB 20, 2004
2.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
I don't know what it is, but this stuff gives me a headache everytime, and the flavor isn't worth the bucks you shell out for it. Stay away, unless it's free of course, which it usually is since everyone loves it.
xetnauq (13) - USA - DEC 12, 2004
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
While itís better than most US macrobrews, it doesnít have the character to compete with a good lager. I feel my friends overrate this beer just because itís often one of the better mass-market alternatives at a typical bar, for a fairly reasonable price. But itís still got a lot of mass-market cheap-beer corny flavor.
birdwax (13) - Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 11, 2005
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Tap is definitely the best way to have it, though a big plus to this beer is how cheap it is in bottles and cans.
beerdc (13) - USA - DEC 4, 2006
3.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Best bang for your buck traditional lager macro around. Not much of a nose but dark amber color and well balanced hops/malts. A great default beer.