jstu9 (402) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 2, 2001
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I rated this a 1.2 on 4/7. This is a pretty common beer ’round these parts. This is not a great beer but it’s better than a 1.2 which I would put as Budweiser territory. This is just a below average beer. It has much more flavor than something like Bud or Rolling Rock but pales in comparison to something that is actually good.
chach11599 (2) - USA - AUG 20, 2001 does not count
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 5/20
Gregory (357) - Pullman, Washington, USA - APR 21, 2002
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
eh, I thought it was pretty bland, and watery, very unimpressed, there has got to be better beers.
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - DEC 8, 2002
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Has a nice malty aroma but that is where it
ends for me. The taste is ruined by rice malt
and some kind of nasty chemical taste. No hopw
to mention. Better than the Black and tan
though. Reminds me of that phony Killians
LiebeBier (808) - Annapolis, Maryland, USA - MAR 29, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Better than Bud and Miller products, but worse than most other options. I had it on Draught because Bud and Miller were my only other "cheap" options. Good beer for certain situations.
sorrowsinger (3) - North Carolina, USA - MAR 14, 2005 does not count
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Light amber in color. Starts off with a nice thick head, but quickly disipates. Little hop aroma, but more than most American Pale Lagers. Weak mouthfeel. Malty taste, little hops. I can almost taste corn in the aftertaste. When compared to other American Pale Lagers, Yuengling is pretty good, but it’s nothing special when placed in the vast spectrum of beers.
Yuhasz (23) - USA - MAR 21, 2005
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I think Yeungling is better than the top 3, but other than that, there is not much going for it. It is one of the better "college beers", but not much more than that
biz82 (1328) - austin, Texas, USA - JUL 4, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
On draught at the Philly airport. Amber with a creamy head. Cheap, corny aroma. Watery with a hint of caramel flavor. Some finishing bitterness.
Hoss (607) - Florida, USA - NOV 15, 2001
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Like the history but the beer is anything but historic
fly (1450) - austin, Tejas, Texas, USA - JUN 4, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
More of a Chesterfield man myself. After a long day in a suit I was anxious for liquid relief. Okay, I admit I was drinking at the reception, but there was a visit with a great aunt after it. Too sweet for my taste. Just like I remembered it - watery, sweet, of tasting, just in the realm of palatable, but not by far. So glad to be done with it, out the door and off to better fare.