Shadallion (534) - Sacramento, California, USA - AUG 13, 2001
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
The Pennsylvania equivalent of the West Coast’s Henry Weinhardt’s Private Reserve. A very basic lager, but with way more flavor and depth than Budweiser. Has an annoyingly metallic flavor, but not bad if you are out of money and want to drink a few brewskis at a party.
drewcifer85710 (158) - Youngstown, Ohio, USA - JUN 22, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Nice for a lager, which is not quite my favorite style. Smooth and a little sweet. Nothing at all offensive.
LordHedgehog (144) - Westminster, Maryland, USA - JAN 17, 2004
1.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pushes the borderline between macroswill and microbrewery. Mix a Bug Light with a high-quality brew, and I'd expect it to taste like this. Probably good to give as gifts to friends that haven't yet disocvered beer beyond BMC, but don't bother buying it for yourself.
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - FEB 4, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
bottle: im surprised by the ratings here. this is your average lager. could be a notch of the huge macros. but not much better. bland taste thin watered down beer with not much going on except a bad aftertaste. stay away from it kids, there are many other that are better.
CamdenD (1110) - Madrid, SPAIN - JUL 4, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Totally missed the boat on this thing, I guess. Wow, nothing really here. Nice dark color, but that’s about it. Smells of rice and corn or something like that. I feel like I’m drinking a lager dropped in a farmyard.
Sregnar35 (989) - Rotterdam, New York, USA - JUN 23, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Use to be hard to come by, now it’s everywhere. Really liked it at first, now all I get is a strange sweet taste out of it, not too enjoyable.
glennmastrange (2359) - hobe sound, Florida, USA - FEB 23, 2007
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Light smells of toasted straw and grass and a faint hint of toffee. Color is amber/orange and the fizzy head didn’t last past a minute. Flavor was only slightly sweet with a short finish. The light body felt watery on the palate. The best part of this beer is the clean finish making it easy drinking. I can see how many beer plebians would think this a great beer. Nothing offensive, but not a whole lot to please the senses.
5RingsPghBL (3) - Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 18, 2007 does not count
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
Being from the burgh I drink Yuengling often. It’s the most common lager drank in western pa. It pours a great brownish color, but lacks a strong hoppy taste. Ether way if you can get your hands on one give it a try.
secretstash (8) - New Jersey, USA - JAN 26, 2008 does not count
1.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
luckly there is always yuengling here if i cant find a good beer i fall back to this been drinking this for way to long to stop now
john81 (8) - USA - FEB 17, 2008 does not count
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
This beer ranks up with bud and bud light, terrible. Some in my area seem to like it, probably due to lack of availability, but overall not a great beer.