bobbert (10) - - MAR 3, 2014
3.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Probably one of the best "mass-produced" beers available. Always has a good poor, with a nice dark appearance to it.
frankliam (11) - New Jersey, USA - JAN 30, 2016
2.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
On tap, can, bottle everywhere. This is the pride of American macros. Dissipating white head, taste is very unoffensive and easy drinking, caramel, a little toasty, nothing special but leaves little to be desired for what it is. An old reliable and like I said, pretty clearly above any American macro.
Kleurplaatje (120) - Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS - JAN 28, 2016
2.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Can. Decent lager. Nothing much special about it, but when I was in the US this was an easy to drink, cheap quencher. Malty in taste, mildly bitterish. Not too watery. Like said, nothing that special, but at least better than all the ’light’ cr*p that is served.
Fr1dge (4) - Mississippi, USA - JAN 27, 2016 does not count
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured from a bottle into a pub glass. Taste is malty caramel with a very average, non-offensive impression. It may be a macro, but I have to say, it’s certainly not a bad macro. I’ve had a few craft beers worse than Yuengling.
finecigar (3) - - JAN 10, 2016 does not count
3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A great anytime beer. Very drinkable. Refreshing, but not too light. Great in bottles, even better on tap if you are in Eastern/Central PA (home to the original brewery).
Sirmixsomewhat (169) - Paoli, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 10, 2015
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
I’ll never stop liking Yuengling as a good, inexpensive beer. It was my go-to in college before I started discovering craft beer, and it remains a beer I’ll drink when it’s available. However, it doesn’t taste nearly as good as it used to, and it’s not good in cans. At all.
Claves77 (189) - Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 9, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Great caramel color, medium carbonation, light leave head in point glass poured from a12oz can. Traditional lager smell with slight sweetness. Good flavor for inexpensive beer. Palate weakens and develops some off flavors. Easy to drink..
Prehensile (3) - - DEC 6, 2015 does not count
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Just far more drinkable than 80 or 90% if the other beers available, All the Micro brewery/IPA crap the snobs been pushing really don’t compare. Somebody should make these beer snobs take a test before they are permitted to post, then again maybe I wouldn’t be able to post here..... This beer has a full robust flavor with no watered down soft drink flavor like the mainstream top 5 producers. Get a grip snobs you lost your way, the reason we drink beer is to take the edge off the daily grind and not break our bank. Now I will return to drinking my 10 dollar a 6 pack Guinness Stout I was in the mood for tonight!!!!
lbianchi66 (221) - FRANCE - DEC 6, 2015
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Robe ambrée et jolie mousse qui ne tient pas. Arômes biscuit et houblon. Goût céréales et fruits jaunes. Final fruits confits. Assez longue en bouche. Pas mal pour une lager.
rocc05rx8 (7) - - DEC 5, 2015 does not count
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
This is an easy beer to drink. Very light on the palate. Has a strong floral after taste though that taste rather perfume like in my opinion. An easy beer to session though, a 6 pack will go quick if you’re a regular beer drinker.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for Android
kingaugusta (157) - Georgia, USA - DEC 3, 2015
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours clear amber with a quick white head. Nose is weak with just a hint of sweetnes and hops. Flavor is similar but slightly richer and more bready. For a cheap lager it does the job.