mullet (849) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - DEC 30, 2003
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Very pale colour, not much head but some clumpy lacing on the glass.
Very little aroma, some cooked spaghetti.
Lean but solid malt flavour. Dryish, balanced finish, some hops in there. Light body. Nice, but hardly exciting.
johndoughty (4001) - cheslyn hay, West Midlands, ENGLAND - DEC 18, 2003
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tried under its Zipfer Original label this is the first beer I have tried starting with the letter Z. after that its all dowh hill.A rather bland pils
with nothing reallty going for it.Nor very memorable-neither good nor bad.
haukur (1309) - Reykjavik, ICELAND - DEC 16, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
a nice, very ordinary hoppy pils. Crispy taste, maybe too crispy. Lack of character, a little boring but drinkable
Kalli (502) - Falun, SWEDEN - DEC 16, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: AUG 14, 2004 Smell of slight skunk, dishwater and stale socks. I maybe getting quite harsh on mainstream lagers. But don't stop me yet...
Very yellow colour and little head. Taste isn't bad really. Bit Watery, but some aftertaste that reminds of international Dutch offerings. Nothing special, but not all that bad.
Re-rate: no, notes, but new numbers. Better than I remembered, but not special still.
bfgill (120) - Tasmania, AUSTRALIA - OCT 11, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: NOV 14, 2003 Not a bad beer. It has a bit going for it, a zesty bitter beer that is quite tasty. I was shocked as i didnt think it was gunna be much. cheers
Jahills (151) - Cambridge (Hobart), AUSTRALIA - OCT 11, 2003
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
This beer really hits the taste buds strongly but nicely. This beer proves that a beer does not have to look good to taste good. This beer has a nice sweet flavour and a sharp pleasurable aftertaste. Maybe able to call this beer a dry. A good drop that surprised me in quality.
fiulijn (14978) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - SEP 18, 2003
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Blond color. Lemon soda aroma. Dry taste, too weak body and malt, correct bitterness, pretty strong final. Quite boring.
CEZ (398) - Milano, ITALY - AUG 26, 2003
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Light golden color. Pours a good and fairly lasting head which leaves some lace on the glass. Nice hops in aroma (which is more intense than in other pilsner) and taste. Clean, refreshing, slightly bitter. Body is light to medium. Finish is moderately bitter and decently lasting. Not bad.
steyrman (12) - TORONTO, Ontario, CANADA - MAY 30, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
I liked this beer a lot. I only felt it was a bit on the flat side. But it has a nice hoppy flavour to it, and it's a bit sweet -- but that's okay with me.
Voivod (304) - Como, ITALY - FEB 12, 2003
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: MAR 9, 2003 Pale golden colour with a good foam, not really persistent. Nice hoppy aroma, but the taste is bad: too sweet for a pilsener, a bit artificial, just a bit malty. Not bad aftertaste, anyway. Refreshing, but I didn't really like it!