mullet (849) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - SEP 9, 2003
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Clear gold colour with poor head retention. Not much aroma, but slightly malty. Highly carbonated, making it appear quite bitter (a bit more malt comes through when it goes flatter.) Only slightly malty, with no hop flavour but a very strong, late developing bitterness with a strong soapy quality. Thin body. Has elements of a good beer, but is missing a lot of malt in the middle and needs more hop character and less bitterness.
presario (4748) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 22, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Gold coloured. Heavy carbonization. Thick white lasting foamy head and light lacing. Aroma is a light combination of yeast and hops. Nice body and lightly foamy mouth feel. Just enough hops to taste. Tastes like a light pilsener with a vegatable edge. Maybe a little too thick for a lawnmower beer.
TipsyMcStager (1139) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - AUG 22, 2003
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Sweet yeasty aroma. Finding a lager with a non-skunky aroma is always nice. Pours golden yellow, thin white head that quickly dissipates. Nice mouthfeel for a lager. Flavour predominately of corn, followed by an alcohol aftertaste. Pound it back with the cabbage rolls and perogies.
NectarFarm (128) - Calgary, CANADA - AUG 20, 2003
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: AUG 23, 2003 pour pissy yellow white head. good amout of lace. little aroma. taste is not to bad quite a bit of body for a lager. nice crisp aftertaste.
ClarkVV (3900) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - AUG 18, 2003
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: DEC 10, 2004 Heard this was good. It wasn’t. The usual stale hops flavor of a low quality beer. Has that texture of an apple. Fluffy and slightly sweet. Was a bit more palatable than some other low-grade European Lagers, but nothing special. It did have a medium body and wasnt as prone to thinning out, but still the flavor was not good. Huge white head, bubbly yellow color. Little aroma. Slight hops and sweetness.
caesar (5454) - Bunnik/Utrecht, NETHERLANDS - AUG 18, 2003
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Probably one of the best lagers i've ever tasted. Nice grainy aroma, with a good balance in hops and grains. Refreshing soft taste, indeed not much bitterness but that's why it tastes so good!
rickgordon (3845) - Göteborg, SWEDEN - AUG 2, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: APR 7, 2004 Bottled. Golden color. This is the best selling(or rather most hyped) beer in Poland they say. No wonder it has an aroma and a flavor of Standard Lager with no bitterness.
jerohen (2045) - Bussum, NETHERLANDS - AUG 2, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Very underrated in my opinion on this site. Actually imho it's one of the best pilseners around. Not as hoppy as most others, but smooth and very easy to drink.
larsniclas (5820) - Billdal, SWEDEN - AUG 2, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
An international standard lager. Good to have a hot summer day. To much carbonation.
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JUL 28, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Yep, its a lager alright. Golden colour on the pour and good head. The initial aroma was one of hoppiness but there is a slightly off tone, cardboardy rather than skunky. The flavour is pleasant enough with a distinctive European profile. Easy drinking but I can see it doesn't Pole well with most.