Do you feel like a brewer is "cheating" if they simply dump lactic acid into the beer instead of producing lactic acid by way of bacteria? Or is it on the same level as using liquid hop extract instead of real hops, hop pellets or whatever? |
What brewers do you think are doing this? |
Originally posted by FrumptyDumpty Per the "forum guidelines", specifically under numbers 2 and 3 of the "DONT’s" section, I can’t and won’t answer this question. http://www.ratebeer.com/ForumRules.asp |
It must be OK to link it if it literally says "Lactic Acid" in the name? http://www.ratebeer.com/beer/alesmith-lil-devil--lactic-acid/158434/ |
hmm. that’s interesting, but not one of the examples I was thinking of. |
I know of a couple who definitely have done this in the past. I won’t call them out on here though. |
Not really. I wouldn’t like it if they were being dishonest about it, but I mostly just care about the taste of the end product. In reality, you’re not going to be able to make good sour beer by pouring in lactic acid. But if someone did, I don’t think I’d mind too much. |
If it tastes good I do not care, at all. |
I would say it’s only cheating if they’re trying to charge $20+ a bottle as if they spent 6+ months maturing the beer. |
Originally posted by TheHOFF43 Pretty much this. |
Originally posted by TheHOFF43 I agree. I know of at least one brewery using acidulated malt, and I like their beer. I think it saves time and money, and that would explain why their beer is significantly cheaper than a lot of the other sour beers out there. That said, I have yet to try anything from them that rivals authentic geuze/lambic. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service