RateBeer
Forums >
Beer Talk | Homebrew | Beer / Site News | Beer Trade | Beer Travel | Food/Beer | For Sale | New Here | Europe/Down Under | Industry | OT - Lite | OT - Medium

BrewDog Launches the World’s Strongest Beer


read 11460 times • 113 replies • posted 11/26/2009 2:27:12 AM

Thread Frozen
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

premium
fidelis83 1259:15
I don’t see how it should be classified in the same way. "Heat distilling" is used essentially to purify the alcohol and remove most of the water and "beery" components. "Freeze distilling" is used to concentrate and purify the alcohol and "beery" components together, and remove mostly water. They are both concentrating some part of the mixture, sure, but to a very different end. 11/26/2009 4:06:49 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
chriso 7062:257
Originally posted by fidelis83
I don’t see how it should be classified in the same way. "Heat distilling" is used essentially to purify the alcohol and remove most of the water and "beery" components. "Freeze distilling" is used to concentrate and purify the alcohol and "beery" components together, and remove mostly water. They are both concentrating some part of the mixture, sure, but to a very different end.

Yep
11/26/2009 4:11:43 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
SilkTork 4691:70
Originally posted by Borresteijn


Unlike with heat-distilling, there is a limit to what can be done with freeze-distilling, if I’m correct. And it’s all a matter of definition.


Both methods have a limit. There is a point at which you can no longer get increased alcohol strength by either freezing or boiling. But you can get higher strength through heat distillation.

Yes, it’s a matter of definition. We could if we so decided say that if a fermented beer is distilled once it can still be defined as a beer. But that would mean that a lot of whiskies could then be classified as beers, and would be stronger than 32%, so we would start to see the strength of the "World’s Strongest Beer" going up.....
11/26/2009 4:17:26 AM

Private message send the author a private message


Trappistenbier 44:2
Originally posted by absolutesites
Originally posted by Trappistenbier
>>Heat distill beer = whiskey. That’s a given.
>>Freeze distill a beer = Eisbock. That’s a given.

both techniques remove "water". Apart from the temperatures, I don’t see any difference
Cheers,
Filip


Maybe your brain is still fried from thinking that something resembling a West Coast IPA was made in Belgium?

Viven IPA ! Yes, comes pretty close tio the real stuff.
Freeze distillation is an analogous method of purification using freezing instead of evaporation. It is not truly distillation, but a recrystallization where the product is the mother liquor, and does not produce products equivalent to distillation. This process is used in the production of ice beer and ice wine to increase ethanol and sugar content, respectively. Unlike distillation, freeze distillation of ferment concentrates poisonous congeners rather than removing them like distillation.
.... that’s it
Cheers,
Filip
11/26/2009 4:20:24 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
chriso 7062:257
Of course low/no alcohol beer is generally made by a process of distillation. Except that, in that case, it is to remove the alcohol rather than to concentrate it. 11/26/2009 4:27:22 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
SilkTork 4691:70
Originally posted by fidelis83
I don’t see how it should be classified in the same way. "Heat distilling" is used essentially to purify the alcohol and remove most of the water and "beery" components. "Freeze distilling" is used to concentrate and purify the alcohol and "beery" components together, and remove mostly water. They are both concentrating some part of the mixture, sure, but to a very different end.


I’m not clear. You say:

"Heat distilling" is used essentially to purify the alcohol and remove most of the water

and

"Freeze distilling" is used to concentrate and purify the alcohol and "beery" components together, and remove mostly water.

Which are agreed facts.

But in there you also mention removing or purifying "beery" components. I’m not clear what you mean by that.

What is not in dispute here as far as I’m concerned is that while the methods are doing the same thing, the flavour will be different. But I’m not sure that flavour difference can be summed up as heat-distillation decreases beer flavour while freeze-distillation increases beer flavour.

If that was the case then Molson Ice and Icehouse would both taste more "beery" than other non freeze-distilled beers. But drinkers of those beers don’t report that at all.
11/26/2009 4:29:38 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
SilkTork 4691:70
Originally posted by chriso
Of course low/no alcohol beer is generally made by a process of distillation. Except that, in that case, it is to remove the alcohol rather than to concentrate it.


So they keep the ice and throw away the liquid.

Interesting, as such beers do retain some of their "beery" quality. Body and bite are missing, but they are still somewhat recognisably beer.

11/26/2009 4:34:13 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
JoeMcPhee 6819:391
You can’t purify indefinitely using fractional freezing and the concentration of ethanol left behind is a consequence of the final temperature, not anything else. Since they said they only got down to -20, I’m very skeptical of the ABV claim. If they simply used the volume of beer they started out with then the volume they ended up with, I’m afraid the calculation is way off. I wouldn’t believe it unless they got it lab tested. 11/26/2009 4:44:14 AM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
SilkTork 4691:70
Originally posted by JoeMcPhee
You can’t purify indefinitely using fractional freezing and the concentration of ethanol left behind is a consequence of the final temperature, not anything else. Since they said they only got down to -20, I’m very skeptical of the ABV claim. If they simply used the volume of beer they started out with then the volume they ended up with, I’m afraid the calculation is way off. I wouldn’t believe it unless they got it lab tested.


They did it more than once. Same as Hair of the Dog Dave - and that was claimed to be 29%, so they are in the same ballpark.
11/26/2009 4:55:11 AM

Private message send the author a private message

schorsch Our schorschbock40% has 39,44% Vol and so Schorschbräu still holds the record,the laboratory-results are open for everybody who wont believe.
great contest,i think 50 % are possible,we are working on this.
11/26/2009 5:07:23 AM

Private message send the author a private message

Home > Forums > Beer Talk

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
Copyright © 2000-2012,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50