RateBeer
home Home > Forums >
Beer Talk | Site News | Beer Trade | Beer Travel | Food/Beer | For Sale | New Here | Homebrew | Non-US | Industry | OT - Lite | OT - Medium

Fascinating Announcement by Portsmouth


read 1605 times • 30 replies • posted 7/17/2012 1:31:02 PM

Thread Frozen
Page 1 | 2 | 3

boogychillin 2:
Concerning Kate the Great. Said that there had been a lot of inquiry so that announcement says that recipe for Kate is property of Todd but IP around Kate the Great is property of Portsmouth. Not sure that I see any real value to the IP given that the majority of value/interest is in the beer itself. So brewing a say pilsner and calling it Kate the Great doesn’t seem like it will garner a lot of attention for Portsmouth. Alternatively, Todd brewing his RIS and calling it brand X seems to create an instant following for brand X.

So, should Kate now be officially retired?

Have never heard of someone attempting to attribute IP value per se to the brand name when the real IP value in this case is in the ingredients. Sure, there is a lot of name recognition for Kate, but the value is really in the contents of the bottle as opposed to the name on the label.

Not sure I understand exactly what Portsmouth is doing here or trying to do.
Private message Send the author a private message


miketd 124
So Portsmouth brews Kate and calls it something else. Surely that will get the NE geeks in line as well.
7/17/2012 1:33:04 PM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
Cletus 6187:218
Lots of info here already and really not much interest in Kate the Great on Ratebeer as compared to Beeradvocate:

http://www.ratebeer.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=208352

7/17/2012 1:34:51 PM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
TURDFERGUSON 3580:147
Facifuckinating
7/17/2012 2:00:03 PM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
GT2 5810:375
Daybreak is 600x times better. Better IP protect that shit
7/17/2012 2:45:51 PM

Private message send the author a private message


ContemplateBeer 1176:87
IP? WTF? WITWIT?
7/17/2012 3:10:09 PM

Private message send the author a private message


boogychillin 2:
Originally posted by miketd
So Portsmouth brews Kate and calls it something else. Surely that will get the NE geeks in line as well.


Actually the opposite. Brew something else and call it Kate.
7/17/2012 3:41:40 PM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
Cletus 6187:218
What they should do is just rename the Smuttynose Imperial Stout Kate the Great and then lobby to have ratebeer merge all the ratings into that category.
7/17/2012 3:43:00 PM

Private message send the author a private message


boogychillin 2:
The only thing that makes sense to me is for Todd to purchase the name. Sounds like a way for Portsmouth to get a little cash from the brewery in Maine.
7/17/2012 3:47:02 PM

Private message send the author a private message


JoeTheYounger 1101:44
Originally posted by ContemplateBeer
IP? WTF? WITWIT?


Interested Party??
7/17/2012 4:38:28 PM

Private message send the author a private message


premium
SamGamgee 2452:182
There is no IP protection for recipes. The only thing that is legally protectable is the branding of the beer. So likely, the brewery continues to brew the beer with the same recipe under the same branding, and the brewer is free to duplicate it as best he can in a new brewery if he wants to. Whenever a brewer leaves a brewery, there is nothing that the brewery can do to stop him from brewing the same beer somewhere else, he just can’t call it the same name without their permission.
7/17/2012 4:50:33 PM

Private message send the author a private message

Home > Forums > Beer Talk

Page 1 | 2 | 3
Copyright © 2000-2013,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50