Just tried this beer for the first time and thought it was great. Was surprised to see how low it scored (3.20). Anyone else agree/disagree? |
It’s pretty much a flawless beer. It wins a medal at GABF virtually every year, in a tough field with over 100 entries. |
not only is it sensitive to age, but it’s sensitive to serving method. small sample sizes may allow you to get a snapshot of a big beer with strong flavors, but smaller beers are generally presented poorly in small samples. "but that’s how the GABF judges taste them!" "yes, but they also are tasting within a style, not putting them up against stronger beers like imperial stout". that’s not how most bottle shares go down. a 2oz pour of pale ale or pilsner will give you a snapshot, but a full serving, with proper freshness, proper gas concentration, proper glassware and a proper pour, that is where you’ll find the real beauty of a beer. or you could just one-and-done tick that mofo, it’s up to you. |
The bottles at my local store always seem to be way out of date. I check every time but it seems like no one is buying it around here. |
Normally I’d point to style percentages... but yeah, even that’s surprisingly low. It’s a damn good pale ale. A regular rotation in our fridge. |
Originally posted by kmweaver See: "No prominent hoppiness, has difficulty standing up even to the hop monsters within its own style." |
I have a lot of theories. |
Don’t go to T.Joe’s very often, but when I do I always grab some. |
Don’t normally drink beer, but when I do; I make it a Mission St Pale Ale |
Originally posted by Trev One of these days I need to go to T. Joe’s with Joe T. and see if the universe implodes. |
Well...there’s your problem. It’s available. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service