There’s also a Stone Pale Ale 2,0 out now with a different recipe, and there will be a completely new Black IPA from them soon. |
what is the motivating force behind all these changes? |
Originally posted by beastiefan2k Sales, basically. Pale, Ruination, and Sublimely couldn’t stay fresh in a lot of their markets. Surely the 90 day dating (120 for Sublimely) played a part (though 3 week old vs. 3 month old Sublimely is like 2 different beers). Those are/were all great beers, but they weren’t the next big thing anymore, so people were scrolling past to grab new stuff, including one-offs and new beers from Stone themselves. The new Pale 2.0, Ruination 2.0, and Enjoy By Black IPA are attempts to revive and "modernize" the brands and keep up with Stone’s balls-out image. I’m excited to try them all, and I’m sure the Enjoy By Black IPA will be a frequent revisit for me, but the other two may end up being once in a while kinds of beers. If that’s the case, they’ll have to boot up 3.0 (and 4.0 and so on) versions sooner than later. At least they’ve embraced that some of their iconic beers got a little stagnant. Not everyone would do that. |
Originally posted by 574deadzone I wish so many more breweries would. |
Yep. Can’t keep up in today’s market making 2000 era production beer or 1990s brew pub beer. too much good beer out and about. |
Just had the Pale Ale 2.0 and the Ruination 2.0 back-to-back. I think I liked them even more than I wanted to like them. Fantastic. Originally posted by MacBoost Green Flash seems to be the closest recent example I can think of -- last year they revamped West Coast and Hop Head |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service