Originally posted by pellegjr Sucrose no es bueno. Doesn’t ferment very well at all. Dextrose is a much better choice. |
I don’t agree with the low esters/overly clean fermentation. Now, obviously, you don’t want any diacetyl or acetaldehyde, but I think brewers make a big mistake whenever they try to make there American-style ales too lager-like. Especially if you are using a Chico strain, don’t overpitch or ferment too cold. At the end of the day, this is still an ale and a touch of fruitiness will compliment all of those hop characteristics nicely. I only pitch 7*10^6 cells/ml to 60 bbl batches of Elevated and 1*10^7 cells/ml to 15 bbl batches of Dank and there’s nothing "dirty" about the fermentation, but they are still characteristically ales through and through. Beyond that, as our pitch rate has come down, our fermentations have actually sped up a bit and our measured IBUs have gone up as well. |
Originally posted by erway That’s interesting; I normally find sucrose ferments pretty well. Not saying you’re wrong, but could you elaborate a bit? I agree with lots of things already posted, but here’s some things I do. 1. Clean base beer: maris otter with a little wheat malt or some oats, attenuated well with US-05. 2. Lots and lots of aroma hops - especially dry hops. 3 hop varieties at the most, unless you really know what you’re doing. 3. Gentle bitterness with a judicious amount something mild like warrior. IPAs are beers I generally like to drink a few of, so I prefer to go easy on the bitterness. I also find very bitter IPAs less food-friendly. I also prefer them on the lower end of the alcohol spectrum for similar reasons. More than 3 points in there, but oh well. |
I agree with Erway about fermentation characteristics. We use a moderately characterful ale yeast with high flocculation and I think that it gives a lot of character to our IPAs, rounding out the hop fruitiness. The key is to have absolutely no detectable diacetyl or other fermentation flaws. I love chico strains for IPAs, but don’t know if I will ever use them myself. There are way too many boringly clean and empty tasting IPAs out there because of a neutral yeast profile. We definitely have to work diligently to get a high attenuation in our beers, but everything typically finishes below 3P. |
Originally posted by SamGamgee Sam and I are on the same page about this. It’s too easy to just pitch a ton of Chico ale into a beer at 64 and get an incredibly clean beer that is ALL hops. And there’s a place for that. There shouldn’t be many 1,000s of places for that though. And that’s definitely something I love about Firestone’s beers. I love Chico for its predictability in the brewery, though I am always trying to find new ways to get character and not just predictability out of it. To me, it’s one of the things that separates the great West Coast hop bombs from the truly world class IPAs. |
I guess I have to be the dick that points out the grammatical mistake in the thread title? |
1) quality ingredients (most importantly fresh hops) |
Originally posted by mkgrenwel OP really dropped the ball on that won... |
Sure seems like there’s a lot of consensus here, and I fall in line: |
I brewed IPAs for years with the various permutations of the Chico strain: Wyeast 1056 / White Labs WLP001 / Safale US-05. The results were clean, good. Then I tried a side-by-side brew, half with Chico, half with Whitbread. The Chico finished at 1.010, the Whitbread at 1.011. But with that one point difference in final gravity, the Whitbread tasted noticeably sweeter. And the taste was almost ’juicy’ by comparison. It really delivered a lot more citrus to the taste. |
Homebrew Shops - A collection of homebrew shops and supply houses submitted by RateBeer readers
Homebrewing Articles - RateBeer Magazine's homebrewing department
Homebrew Recipes - Experiment, share and post your own homebrew recipes
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service