There is a fine line there, flavorless isn’t always "bad" tasting, although MGD 64 did all it could, so it’s very possible.
|
Post a reply 
Private message 
|
|
Sounds like the very best in mediocrity.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
Depends on the beer, depends on the mood and depends on the weather
Nothing like a lukewarm imperial stout on a cold winter day
Nothing like an ice cold APA on a hot summer day
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
I prefer the taste of cold to the taste of drinkable.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
+1 I find the taste of cold only slightly less drinkable than the taste of drinkable yet more tasty.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
I like my beers as drinkable as the Rockies.
As an aside, I DO find drinkability a legitimate consideration when rating a beer, just not always necessarily a quality. The term has been co-opted by a brand that offers nothing but: you can slug it back like water because it tastes like water.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
Basically, the cheaper the macro brew, the colder it has to be to get it down.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
This is a bashing thread, and should be deleted as such.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
Alright, so here’s the question (bashing aside):
I have never looked into an unopened bottle and noticed any bubbles... big or small... I was under the understanding that the CO2 was dissolved until it was able to escape. If that’s the case, what the hell difference does it make whether they inject small or large bubbles. Don’t they reform when I pop the cap?
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
Cold.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
