Why are bombers such a ripoff compared to sixers, and generally accepted?

Reads 7801 • Replies 48 • Started Friday, March 02, 2012 11:20:07 PM CT

Thread Frozen
 
iowaherkeye
beers 2703 º places 29 º 23:20 Fri 3/2/2012

Discuss.

 
fly
beers 1461 º places 247 º 23:23 Fri 3/2/2012

fair question, curious of the response.

 
maneliquor
beers 3483 º places 153 º 23:54 Fri 3/2/2012

Im also pretty curious actually

 
DYCSoccer17
beers 3620 º places 332 º 23:59 Fri 3/2/2012

Economy of scale for the purchaser. I personally will be more willing to buy just a bomber of a new beer that I have never had before, despite it seeming to be a relative rip-off in 6 pack terms. Itís rare that a beer is available in both 6ers and 22ís, so itís not like the consumer really has much of a choice anyway.

I think itís the same reason that wine for the most part is sold in 750mL bottles rather than 5 liter containers. People are more willing to pay $20 for a 750mL bottle of wine than say $75 for a 5 liter container of wine they have never tried before.

 
billk
beers 353 º places 60 º 02:01 Sat 3/3/2012

the more you buy the less you pay per ounce. 12 pks are usually cheaper than 2 6ers. Handling is more time consuming with lots of smaller units.

 
left_bank
beers 99 º places 84 º 02:16 Sat 3/3/2012

maybe because you call them "bombers",and maybe they are today.(i havenít bought a 625 ml beer in more then 25 years).where i was a teen in montreal,LARGE bottles were always cheaper then 6 packs.when i later traveled through other parts of canada,mostly ontario,i found "knee-highs" to be more expensive then 6 packs and i asked why!the answer i got was that they were the most stolen beers at the lcbo.

 
left_bank
beers 99 º places 84 º 02:18 Sat 3/3/2012

-should of said large bottles were always cheaper then 6 packs for the same amount of beer.

 
billk
beers 353 º places 60 º 02:28 Sat 3/3/2012

When I came of age Yuengling was 3 qts for a buck on sale. We drank Iron City instead for the same price.

 
jesskidden
places 1 º 03:42 Sat 3/3/2012

Itís one of the, uh, unique aspects of the craft industry that give lie to the romantic myth that theyíre only in it for the love of brewing, not to make a profit, etc.

As noted by others, traditionally in the US brewing industry larger bottles were always a better value- quarts cost less per ounce than 16ís, 16ís were a better value than 12ís, and 7 oz. nips were the least economical. True returnable/refillable "deposit" bottles were the best value, because the bottle was reused numerous times, so the consumer did not have to pay for it and then throw it away.

Craft brewers have turned that old convention on itís head and even thoí a case of 6 packs obviously have much more packaging costs than a case of 12 bombers (almost twice the crowns, twice the labels, twice the bottles plus the additional 6 pack "baskets") they are still cheaper per ounce.

The "growler" is maybe an even bigger joke. Instead of "renting" the returnable/reusable bottle, you are now required to BUY it (often sold with a large profit margin built-in) AND to clean it yourself. There are NO extra packaging costs (no labels, crowns, cardboard inner or outer shippers, etc.) yet often a 64 oz. growler costs more than a 72 oz. six pack of the same beer.

While the old quart beer bottle had a sort of "downmarket" image (thoí not as much as the 40 oz. bottle thatís replaced it in many cases), the craft brewers have given the "bomber" (despite itís nickname) an "upscale" image - sort of wine-like, to be shared with friends, sophisticated, etc. The 750 ml. bottles even moreso. Iíve seen people discussing BYOBís and saying things like "Well, Iíd bring a bomber or 750 or two to a nice restaurant, but never a "sixpack"..."

Now some will claim that the sixpack is the "larger" package, so thatís why a bomber cost more but, usually, in markets that sell singles, the single 12 oz. bottle will ALSO be the better value per ounce. Brewers complain that the changeover from 12ís to 22ís is costly in manhours, but, of course, after running the 22ís theyíll have to change back to 12ís, yet donít add additional costs to those bottles. Retailers often are more likely to add a new bomber to their shelves (usually warm shelf), since it takes up less space than a sixpack row in the cooler.

So, why do they charge more per ounce for a bomber? Because they can and many people will still buy them.

 
tjohn2401
06:37 Sat 3/3/2012

Itís been a while since Iíve bought a 40oz Bud Light...how is it priced compared to a six pack? Is it a better deal per ounce?

And itís interesting to me that a large format bottle of craft beer is considered more "sophisticated" while a large format bottle of BMC is perceived as a poor manís drink. At least thatís how Iíve perceived it. I always kinda felt like a scum ass walking up to the counter with a couple 40ís or 22ís.

 
MacBoost
beers 1738 º places 26 º 06:45 Sat 3/3/2012

Originally posted by tjohn2401
Itís been a while since Iíve bought a 40oz Bud Light...how is it priced compared to a six pack? Is it a better deal per ounce?

And itís interesting to me that a large format bottle of craft beer is considered more "sophisticated" while a large format bottle of BMC is perceived as a poor manís drink. At least thatís how Iíve perceived it. I always kinda felt like a scum ass walking up to the counter with a couple 40ís or 22ís.


Donít know about the 40ís, but around here, a 24oz can of Bud is $1.19 while a 6 pack is $5.99.