Discuss. |
fair question, curious of the response. |
Im also pretty curious actually |
Economy of scale for the purchaser. I personally will be more willing to buy just a bomber of a new beer that I have never had before, despite it seeming to be a relative rip-off in 6 pack terms. It’s rare that a beer is available in both 6ers and 22’s, so it’s not like the consumer really has much of a choice anyway. |
the more you buy the less you pay per ounce. 12 pks are usually cheaper than 2 6ers. Handling is more time consuming with lots of smaller units. |
maybe because you call them "bombers",and maybe they are today.(i haven’t bought a 625 ml beer in more then 25 years).where i was a teen in montreal,LARGE bottles were always cheaper then 6 packs.when i later traveled through other parts of canada,mostly ontario,i found "knee-highs" to be more expensive then 6 packs and i asked why!the answer i got was that they were the most stolen beers at the lcbo. |
-should of said large bottles were always cheaper then 6 packs for the same amount of beer. |
When I came of age Yuengling was 3 qts for a buck on sale. We drank Iron City instead for the same price. |
It’s one of the, uh, unique aspects of the craft industry that give lie to the romantic myth that they’re only in it for the love of brewing, not to make a profit, etc. |
It’s been a while since I’ve bought a 40oz Bud Light...how is it priced compared to a six pack? Is it a better deal per ounce? |
Originally posted by tjohn2401 Don’t know about the 40’s, but around here, a 24oz can of Bud is $1.19 while a 6 pack is $5.99. |
2000- 2024 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service