overall
99
98
style
RATINGS: 4002   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.87/5   EST. CALORIES: 216   ABV: 7.2%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This is an aggressive beer. You probably won’t like it. It is quite doubtful that you have the taste or sophistication to appreciate an ale of this quality and depth.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


4.3
RedHaze (371) - Where the hell am I?, Nebraska, USA - AUG 17, 2005
Got this bottle at Dyess, AFB in Texas. Poured a dark brown/reddish color, with a good 1 inch head, and has a nice hop and malt smell to it. Taste is pretty strong hops, a little roasted malt, caramel and alcohol. This is my first beer from Stone Brewing, and I can say that I’m thoroughly impressed. I was able to pick up some of their IPA as well, and I now can’t wait to try that.

3.9
kook (2033) - Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA - AUG 17, 2005
Bottle (GBBF): Copper with a mild brown head. Suprisingly subtle malt aroma, with big hops dominating. I expected more balance. Flavour however is a combo of sticky sweet caramel malts with a strong citric hoppy finish. Medium-full bodied, and quite tasty.

4
TheBeerOrg (2145) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - AUG 17, 2005
UPDATED: JUL 12, 2007 Draft at Rich O’s. Pours dark amber with a foamy tan head. Has a bready, malty aroma that was surprising mild for such a hopped beer. Taste is intense maltiness with an insane hop finish. Prepare for an assault on your taste buds.

4.2
michaeltrego (101) - Amherst, New Hampshire, USA - AUG 15, 2005
Mmmmm, yeah. Floral and fruity in the nose, but not too much -- and a wonderful deep amber/ruby color. Pours with a nice head, and the sweet smell (and taste) of success. Big bitter/malt balance is awesome. Life is good!

4.8
drfabulous (8802) - Lexington, Kentucky, USA - AUG 12, 2005
One of my favorites. Few words can describe the rich malty taste of this barley wine. I drank four in a row once at a bar in San Diego. This is serious beer.

2.8
Pete (6) - USA - AUG 12, 2005 does not count
I think the only thing arrogant about this beer is the label. It *is* a good beer, however I don’t find it live up to all the hype that people throw it’s way. It’s just too bitter and herby to be on the top of my list.

3.6
JK (6342) - St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA - AUG 11, 2005
The aroma is all about strong floral and fruity hops. The beer is dark red and left a thin lace on the glass. Herbal flavor with lots of hop bitterness. Heavy and full bodied.

4
walter (359) - Staunton, Virginia, USA - AUG 10, 2005
Bottle. Deep reddish amber with a quickly fading head and good lacing; there’s a good skin the whole way down. Aromas are not quite as "arrogant" as expected-- caramel malts, light roasted notes, clovelike spiciness, ethanol, hops citrus and some sourness. Full mouthfeel, almost creamy on the palate. Flavors of all the above sort of get tossed about and then settle into a very long, tacky sweet&sour aftertaste. Great stuff. Pour both glasses at once-- that second one’ll be just right when you get to it.

4.7
surfrules (1) - Oceanside, California, USA - AUG 4, 2005 does not count
This is one beer good something fierce! This beer purs like a typical Pale Ale but the taste is far from it. The good part about this beer is thatis not too much head. It is not too rich and can easily be drunk during the bitter cold or a nice hot Death Valley afternoon. Definetly not for the weak, and hippis of course....

4.1
LioNiNoiL (8) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - AUG 1, 2005 does not count
very dark brown, fine creamy tan head, nicely full-bodied with a bitter, hoppy start and clean, sweet finish — much better than expected.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 344 345 346  347  348 349 350 » 435
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5