RATINGS: 325   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.22/5   EST. CALORIES: 141   ABV: 4.7%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This Golden Sorghum Lager will appeal to beer drinkers who prefer the lighter taste of lagers produced by the major brewers, such as Anheuser-Busch, Coors, Miller, and Heineken. This ale has a light crisp taste to meet the thirst quenching requirements of the lager style while still having enough body to interest the ale drinker during the spring and summer seasons. This beer has low bitterness and a subtle but pleasant hop aroma that will gently caress the senses.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


1.7
berrya785 (441) - Kansas, USA - AUG 3, 2012
12 oz bottle packaged as Bard’s Original Sorghum. Worst beer I’ve ever had. First beer ever I didn’t want to finish (I still did).

1.7
EtTuCthulhu (1391) - Columbia, Missouri, USA - OCT 17, 2013
UPDATED: JUN 5, 2015 The appearance of this beer is a deep golden color with a very, very small white head, and the aroma is really sweet with some yeast scents. The taste is quite sour and a touch of sweetness, but the palate is really unpleasant due to the light body, thin and slick texture, soft carbonation, and a really, really sour and off-putting finish.

1.7
brandon1989 (712) - Lewisville, Texas, USA - NOV 10, 2013
pours a clear golden color with a small white head that dissipates quickly. the aroma is husky and the taste is where this beer goes south fast. maybe its because i have never had a gluten free beer so i guess i could be biased but this beer is not good. the taste is syrupy. i would not recommend.

1.7
Travlr (26431) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JAN 18, 2017
Ticking bottle from Total Wine. Clear yellow color, scant head. Aroma of way overripe stone fruit. Taste is thin medicinal cider.

1.6
DocLock (11191) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 3, 2005
Pours gold with little head. Some hops and malt aromas. The taste is grainy, with some thiols detected. Medium palate. This one was expensive, and a disappointment.

1.6
burgerlicious (308) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - JUL 30, 2005
Reading the commericial description, what kind of brewer would intentionally try to appeal to those who prefer Coors, Miller, etc? I guess they succeeded, because I find this just as rancid/repulsing/awful as the macros.

1.6
thedm (6319) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - NOV 18, 2006
This bottled brew from a bottle shop marked bollted on 9:43 BT001 05/30/06 poured a small sized head of foamy finely sized white colored bubbles that were mostly diminishing and left behind a transparent typically carbonated orange colored body and a fair lacing. The funky aroma was dirty. The mouth feel was tingly at the start and at the finish. The strange off flavor contained notes of mild spice. A horrible one that I would not buy again. Just too weird for my tatstes!

1.6
Bockyhorsey (2638) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - DEC 4, 2006
Bland yeast aroma. Golden body with no head. Bitter grain swill beer flavor. Overly bitter on the palate. YUCK!

1.6
tyler_mn (2464) - SLP, Minnesota, USA - FEB 20, 2007
12 oz bottle. Pours gold with amber highlights. Small white head quickly disappears. Skunky pilsner like aroma. Tastes like wet cardboard smells with a hint of malty sweetness. Short and metallic finish. Decent for what it is I guess.

1.6
BDR (2535) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - FEB 26, 2007
Yellow color with dry honey color and flavor. Grainy flavor with the faintest hint of coffee.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 26 27 28  29  30 31 32 » 34
A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5